...and a rootkit was installed.
A very interesting story. I'm interested how a regular user was able to
install a rootkit. I realize that you may not know.
Didn't have the time to analyse that but I presume through privilege
escalation.
Cause this user had direct access to the running
This is my first time going through LFS, everything went fine (I think)
up until I tried sudo make on glibc. I followed the directions
verbatim and I have run through the steps from gcc-4.6.2 - Pass 1 all
the way back up to glibc. Everytime I run into this (only the last few
lines):
On 9 April 2012 17:11, Sean Hinchee henesy1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first time going through LFS, everything went fine (I think)
up until I tried sudo make on glibc. I followed the directions
verbatim and I have run through the steps from gcc-4.6.2 - Pass 1 all
the way back up to glibc.
On Apr 9, 2012 3:12 PM, Sean Hinchee henesy1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first time going through LFS, everything went fine (I think)
up until I tried sudo make on glibc. I followed the directions
Must admit it has been a while since I went through the book, and I use a
slightly different
Do some particular lfs devs write these patches?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/7.1/
Or do they copy patches somewhere and store there in that mirror?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
I've made some rules in Udev:
#Logitech Dinovo Keyboard
SUBSYSTEMS==usb, ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}==03,
ATTRS{bInterfaceProtocol}==01, ENV{ID_CLASS}=kbd,
SYMLINK+=input/keyboard-dinovo
#Logitech MX Revolution Mouse
BUS==usb, KERNEL==event[0-9]*, SYSFS{idVendor}==046d,
SYSFS{idProduct}==c51a,
loki wrote:
...and a rootkit was installed.
A very interesting story. I'm interested how a regular user was able to
install a rootkit. I realize that you may not know.
Didn't have the time to analyse that but I presume through privilege
escalation.
Cause this user had direct access to
Please post X problems on blfs-support.
-- Bruce
Esben Stien wrote:
I've made some rules in Udev:
#Logitech Dinovo Keyboard
SUBSYSTEMS==usb, ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}==03,
ATTRS{bInterfaceProtocol}==01, ENV{ID_CLASS}=kbd,
SYMLINK+=input/keyboard-dinovo
#Logitech MX Revolution Mouse
gmspro wrote:
Do some particular lfs devs write these patches?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/7.1/
Or do they copy patches somewhere and store there in that mirror?
Yes.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Эмиль Кранц bl8r1...@tut.by wrote:
Well, here is the snippet of ncurses configure script. All book
instructions were followed to the letter.
Fresh install, host is BLFS-7.0
./configure --prefix=/tools --with-shared \
--without-debug --without-ada
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486 option now?
--
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear
ante wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:22:57 +0100
gmspro gms...@yahoo.com wrote:
Do some particular lfs devs write these patches?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/7.1/
Or do they copy patches somewhere and store there in that mirror?
The lfs patches are in a subversion repository. Some of them
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
It was added 09/15/07. See
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018
Thank you.
--
ante
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
@bruce,
Yes.
-- Bruce
Yes for what? Yes for 'Or do they copy patches somewhere and store there in
that mirror?' or Yes for 'Do some particular lfs devs write these patches?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/7.1/ '
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
On Apr 9, 2012 11:44 PM, gmspro gms...@yahoo.com wrote:
@bruce,
Yes.
-- Bruce
Yes for what? Yes for 'Or do they copy patches somewhere and store there
in that mirror?' or Yes for 'Do some particular lfs devs write these
patches? http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/7.1/ '
Look
18 matches
Mail list logo
