[lfs-support] 5.5. GCC-4.7.1 - Pass 1 Error
Hi All, I am getting following error in make command in '5.5. GCC-4.7.1 - Pass 1' Please help Error * _SHARED_LIBGCC` -DCONFIGURE_SPECS=\\ \ -c ../../gcc-4.7.1/gcc/gccspec.c -o gccspec.o) ../../gcc-4.7.1/gcc/gcc.c:714: error: expected ',' or ';' before 'GNU_USER_LINK_EMULATION64' make[2]: *** [gcc.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs rm gcc.pod make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc' make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 Regards, Rahul -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 2787, Issue 1
I got unresolved error with LFS 7.2. Now I'm trying with LFS 7.0, probably it will more smoothly give less errors for Debian Squeeze. Thank you for your kind words and support. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, lfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.orgwrote: Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to lfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.org You can reach the person managing the list at lfs-support-ow...@linuxfromscratch.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of lfs-support digest... Today's Topics: 1. The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze? (Andi Blacktigerbro) 2. Re: The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze? (Pierre Labastie) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:53:13 +0700 From: Andi Blacktigerbro bl4cktig3r...@gmail.com Subject: [lfs-support] The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze? To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Message-ID: CAG6hOjhq2JG=xsbs4wwzsLvP=Or00_Qptu8J= ucpoxwk3ta...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 What is the easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze (i386), because Debian packages always outdated? -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/attachments/20130204/60d9bf86/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:53:02 +0100 From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr Subject: Re: [lfs-support] The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze? To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Message-ID: 510f5ace.7090...@neuf.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Le 04/02/2013 04:53, Andi Blacktigerbro a ?crit : What is the easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze (i386), because Debian packages always outdated? I think you can use any recent version of LFS. I have been able to build the LFS svn version on debian squeeze i386 about two days ago. It went smoothly. Pierre -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page End of lfs-support Digest, Vol 2787, Issue 1 -- [Andi is your brother] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze?
Hi guys, May be a bit off topic, but not terribly. I was invited to (I do much beta testing and reviews) and so just started using Elementary OS Luna beta, and I was wondering what the LFS community thought of it? Personally I love the clean, polished... Yes, OSX look, but it manages to remain unique and has an almost special, crafted-with-care feel. The thing I dislike is the Unity components. I never liked Unity. With that, I've a question in that regard. How does one get rid of Unity just enough that it doesn't become problematic by causing missing and orphaned dependencies? Or is it better to just leave it there, and remix the frontend to one's own liking? Regards, MR Essop -Original Message- From: Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr Sender: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:53:02 To: LFS Support Listlfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Reply-To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [lfs-support] The easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze? Le 04/02/2013 04:53, Andi Blacktigerbro a écrit : What is the easiest Linux From Scratch version to be builded under Debian Squeeze (i386), because Debian packages always outdated? I think you can use any recent version of LFS. I have been able to build the LFS svn version on debian squeeze i386 about two days ago. It went smoothly. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 2787, Issue 1
Le 04/02/2013 09:04, Andi Blacktigerbro a écrit : I got unresolved error with LFS 7.2. Now I'm trying with LFS 7.0, probably it will more smoothly give less errors for Debian Squeeze. Thank you for your kind words and support. Hi Andi, I am not sure about what you did. If you get errors on Debian Squeeze with LFS 7.2, it might be an indication that you miss some required tools, which are not installed in a default Debian installation. Have you checked the host requirements, as on page vii of the preface? After a standard installation, you need to run (as root, or using sudo): apt-get install binutils apt-get install bison apt-get install bzip2 apt-get install gawk apt-get install gcc (installs also glibc-dev) apt-get install make - If you miss any of those packages, you will run into trouble at some point, whatever the LFS version. Good luck, Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ext4 in LFS ?
stosss wrote: Greetings, I haven't been here for a very long time. FAQ didn't answer my question and the mail archives once had questions and probably some answers but the links to them are broken so nothing was found. Is there any valid reason not to use ext4 in LFS? ext4 is fine. The LFS-BOOK-7.2-NOCHUNKS.html shows nothing about formatting the partitions with ext4. It only shows ext3 and clicking on the link directing you to the BLFS book talks about all sorts of other file systems but not ext4. It's a part of the standard util-linux package and the kernel. I am just starting the build process so I can go with ext3 if it is not wise to go with ext4. I actually don't think that for the lfs root partition that ext4 will get you much over an ext3 partition. 10 GB is way more than needed and ext4's advantages are primarily the ability to manage very large partitions and files. There's nothing wrong with creating a separate /home with a very large partition. I use a 100MB ext2 partition for /boot, so you can mix/match as much as you want. You do need the capability for each partition type built into the kernel. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ext4 in LFS ?
On Feb 4, 2013, at 8:03 PM, stosss wrote: Is there any valid reason not to use ext4 in LFS? The LFS-BOOK-7.2-NOCHUNKS.html shows nothing about formatting the partitions with ext4. It only shows ext3 and clicking on the link directing you to the BLFS book talks about all sorts of other file systems but not ext4. It's an example, like setting up your partitions and filesystems. You can use whatever you want for a filesystem. Also, make sure the boot loader, if you choose not to use grub, can access the bootfiles with the system you choose. Sincerely, William Harrington-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
