For the benefit of anyone who may come across this thread after
experiencing similar errors:
Despite the disappointing check summary, I pressed on with the build and
was able to complete it successfully without further problems. Subsequent
packages tested well, and the resulting system booted
the patch be applied at all, and if so, where would that happen if
not in 6.39?
Thanks.
Bob Elgie
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
There are also 24 timeouts in libmudflap.
Up to this point in LFS 7.4, I haven't encountered unsolvable difficulties.
The checks thus far in Chapter 6 have been successful.
If these results are, in fact, not acceptable, how far back should I
retrace my steps?
I will be grateful for any advice.
Bob Elgie
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Unix User mailinglistacco...@yahoo.comwrote:
Bob Elgie bob.el...@gmail.com schrieb am 10:22 Dienstag, 17.Dezember
2013:
I'm unhappy with the check summary for this package. After similar results
on my first attempt, I executed
rm -Rf gcc-4.8.1/ gcc-build
