Re: [lfs-support] CLFS

2014-02-19 Thread Chris Staub
On 02/19/14 05:46, loki wrote: Heya, just wanted to ask what happened to CLFS? On the address http://www.cross-lfs.org/ I'm getting a Domain for Sale. Regards, Daniel Nothing happened to it, it's where it's always been, at trac.cross-lfs.org. --

Re: [lfs-support] Two suspected bugs

2014-01-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/16/14 13:00, parmenides wrote: Hi, I am build the LFS 7.4 following the book, and find two suspected bugs: (2) In chapter 5, 5.7. Glibc-2.18 I got the following warning: configure: WARNING: *** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions: autoconf *** some

Re: [lfs-support] Gcc-4.8.1 Section 5.5.1 - libmpfr

2014-01-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/16/14 18:07, William Darryl Jackson wrote: On 01/16/2014 04:23 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 16/01/2014 22:15, William Darryl Jackson a écrit : You are correct - Pierre, I came to that same conclusion. So I very carefully repeated the steps on page 36 to ensure those folders were being

Re: [lfs-support] GCC-4.8.1 Pass1 C++

2014-01-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/11/14 03:35, William Darryl Jackson wrote: Greetings: Having rebuilt from scratch, and being certain all steps were followed accurately - in the proper folder and environment; GCC 'make' is still giving me the following error: configure: error: C++ compiler missing or inoperational

Re: [lfs-support] folder permissions

2014-01-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote: Yes, mount /dev/sdb2 on /media/lfs type ext4 (rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered,uhelper=udisks) The echo $LFS, is constantly slipping in and out of /mnt/lfs. I have to keep doing the 'export'. Right now it returns

Re: [lfs-support] Chapter 5.7 glibc-2.1{7,8}

2014-01-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/11/14 14:38, Frans de Boer wrote: Dear reader, I am having problems lately making the tool chain on my x86_64 machine. I finally traced it back to chapter 5.7, where glibc aborts with the next messages: Makerules:755: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop. make[1]: Leaving

Re: [lfs-support] folder permissions

2014-01-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/11/14 14:47, William Darryl Jackson wrote: On 01/11/2014 02:33 PM, Chris Staub wrote: On 01/11/14 14:25, William Darryl Jackson wrote: Yes, Your output says there is something mounted on /media/lfs, yet you keep saying you are assigning LFS=/mnt/lfs. I was trying to follow

Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?

2013-12-01 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/01/2013 06:27 PM, frozen tuesday wrote: Is it sufficient to sudo before every command in the rest of the book, or do I need to find a way to log in as the user root? Thanks. You stay root anyway as long as you're in the chroot. I see the chroot is coming up in 6.4 but

Re: [lfs-support] lfs 7.4 / Section 6 - Building the LFS System as sudo?

2013-11-29 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/29/2013 01:56 PM, frozen tuesday wrote: Hello all -- Thanks to the help I have received here or elsewhere, I have made it as far as section III in the online instructions: Building the LFS System. I am using Linux Mint 15 as my host computer which only allows me to sudo before

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with compiling GCC-4.8.1 (LFS 7.4)

2013-11-02 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/02/2013 08:14 AM, Bernard Hurley wrote: Hi there! I have been trying to compile GCC-4.8.1 in section 5.5 of LFS 7.4. The first problem was that the compiler didn't seem to understand (a parameter to configure on p.37): --disable-libstdc++-v3 In case anyone else has the problem,

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with compiling GCC-4.8.1 (LFS 7.4)

2013-11-02 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/02/2013 12:52 PM, Chris Staub wrote: The second problem is a bit more intractible. Having made the apbove adjustment to configure, when I run make it bombs out with: snip === configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile

Re: [lfs-support] sed 'no such file' problem - LFS 7.1, Section 6.13, Binutils-2.22

2013-01-07 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/06/2013 06:15 PM, Ahmed ELtayeb wrote: just cd binutils-2.22 and everything will be fine Valentine Michael Smith siasl1952 at gmail.com writes: I removed the outdated standards.info file, and then tried the sed command:sed -i.bak '/^INFO/s/standards.info //' etc/Makefile.inI

Re: [lfs-support] Boot LFS from usb

2013-01-07 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/07/2013 07:18 PM, Baho Utot wrote: I am trying to put LFS on a thumbdrive to use a rescue/fixit system. When I boot it can not find the usb drive and filesystem. I have the correct filesystem built into the kernel, not as a module I am miising something in my kernel config. This

Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1

2013-01-05 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/05/2013 07:35 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I have recurrently written about this, here. My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of LFS, was that the last line: gcc compilation OK that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines were

Re: [lfs-support] How to upgrade a single package?

2013-01-03 Thread Chris Staub
On 01/03/2013 04:13 AM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, all: sorry for my naive question again. I now noticed coreutils has been upgraded from 8.19 to 8.20 . I'd love to upgrade it without rebuilding everything from scratch, but just this single package. I can always chroot into the environment

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

2012-12-26 Thread Chris Staub
You should have liblzma.so in /tools/lib and lzma.h in /tools/include. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Hi Bruce, Yes bith files

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

2012-12-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/26/2012 05:25 PM, Baho Utot wrote: On 12/26/2012 02:10 PM, Chris Staub wrote: liblzma should be in /lib, not /usr/lib. Also, can you copy the contents of config.log? From 6.46. Xz-5.0.4 ./configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/lib --docdir=/usr/share/doc/xz-5.0.4 the prefix puts

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 section 6.52 kmod-9

2012-12-25 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/26/2012 02:44 AM, Israel Silberg wrote: Hi all, I'm building LFS 7.2, and during the running of the configure section of the kmod-9 I got the following: checking for liblzma... no configure: error: Package requirements (liblzma = 4.99) were not met: No package 'liblzma' found

Re: [lfs-support] Is it normal that I obtained a lot of error messages while building glibc-2.16.0?

2012-12-22 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/22/2012 06:30 AM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, all: I noticed on http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html , I may meet some building errors while building glibc. I obtained the following errors. I just wonder if as mentioned on the above page, can I just ignore

Re: [lfs-support] make install gcc 4.7.2 fail...

2012-12-22 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/22/2012 03:37 PM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, Christ: I recalled it now... This problem is probably caused by the SD card automatic disconnection from the computer during *Installing Basic System Software --- probably happened after make at page

Re: [lfs-support] make install gcc 4.7.2 fail...

2012-12-20 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/20/2012 06:33 PM, JIA Pei wrote: However, I *failed to make install gcc 4.7.2* The error message obtained is: /* tar -cf - .; exit 0) | (cd /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/include; tar xpf - ) /bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not found /bin/sh: line 1: tar: command not found

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-18 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/18/2012 07:51 AM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, Simon: The reason why I'm doing that (use binutils-2.23.1 instead of binutils-2.22) is I don't want to 100% strictly follow LFS book, so that I might be able to understand how to build my own Linux deeper. And, even now, I've got no idea why we

Re: [lfs-support] Glibc installation in target machine fails

2012-12-18 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/18/2012 08:25 AM, Prabhu wrote: Hi, Since its a check, I ignored it and I performed with the next step that's *make install* even this fails and throw me an error as * *ERROR*: make[2]: *** No rule to make target

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-18 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/18/2012 09:23 PM, JIA Pei wrote: Now, fail to build check-0.9.9 ... The error message is: //mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: note: 'pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1' is defined in DSO /tools/lib/libpthread.so.0 so try adding it to the

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-18 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/18/2012 09:07 PM, JIA Pei wrote: Thank you so much Bruce... I proceed to expect 5.45 now But, I got two test fails as follows. Is this normal? If you had read the book like you're expected to, you would already know the answer to this. If you can't be bothered to read it, quit

Re: [lfs-support] Is it a must to separate Binutils and GCC into Pass 1 and Pass 2?

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/17/2012 06:00 AM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, all; Sorry to bug all of you again. I've successfully built Binutils 2.23.1 GCC 4.7,2 Linux-kernel 3.6.10 Glib 2.16.0 However, is it a must for me to proceed to the pass 2 of binutils and gcc? Whatever is in the book is there for a

Re: [lfs-support] Binutils patch, why?

2012-12-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/16/2012 06:55 AM, JIA Pei wrote: Hi, all: 1) From http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html , binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why? What is this patch for? *patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch* It tells you in the book. Try reading

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

2012-12-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/15/2012 02:58 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: Hello all, I am on section 5.15.1 (installing bash) on LFS version 7.2 and I am receiving an error after running make: $ make -j yacc -d ./parse.y make: execvp: yacc: Permission denied make: *** [y.tab.c] Error 127 I have encountered this

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

2012-12-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/15/2012 03:03 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: An additional piece of information that might be important: The patch asked for in the book is bash-4.2-fixes-8.patch while the one I have from the website and that one that I applied is bash-4.2-fixes-10.patch Could that be the cause of the

Re: [lfs-support] Installation of Bash 5.15 Error on make

2012-12-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/15/2012 03:11 AM, Alexander Spitzer wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for your reply. ls -l /usr/bin/yacc gives: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41 Dec 13 19:13 /usr/bin/yacc That explains it, that script is not executable. chmod a+x /usr/bin/yacc and it should work. --

Re: [lfs-support] Permission error in Binutil while make install (LFS7.2)

2012-12-08 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/08/2012 03:49 PM, Prabhu wrote: Hi I'm getting permission error while make install the binutil package, but I could successfully able to create folder in all the 3 dir (source,tools,usr) with the user lfs. I rollback and reperformed the chapter 4.1 to 4.4, but I'm still facing the issue.

Re: [lfs-support] error when i build webkitgtk-1.10.1

2012-12-02 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/02/2012 11:22 AM, Francisco Jesús Navarro Cortés wrote: Hello. i try build with make-3.82 and make-3.82-upstream_fixes-3.patch the source webkitgtk-1.10.1 but get this error: ./.libs/libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so http://libwebkit2gtk-3.0.so: undefined reference to `glCullFace'

Re: [lfs-support] /dev/pts and /dev/shm not mounted on boot

2012-12-01 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/02/2012 01:02 AM, d...@fluidnetwork.com wrote: Hello all, Just built two systems, one of HLFS-development and one LFS-7.2. Not sure what I did wrong, but neither system would successfully mount /dev/pts or /dev/shm on bootup - both were complaining about nonexistant mount points.

Re: [lfs-support] next step wireless

2012-11-28 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/27/2012 05:15 PM, Dave wrote: Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:09:33 Dave wrote: I only have WiFi with WEP encryption here, can the WICD pkg and DHCP alone handle this connect? You will need some other packages, like wpa_supplicant, but the answer is

Re: [lfs-support] -z option ...no issue

2012-11-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/26/2012 12:19 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: 王杰清 wrote: hi, when i install glibc following lfs.7.2 book, i meet with the error configure: error : linker with -z support required is my gcc wrong in my host? should i reinstall it ,or how can i fix it . Any advice is pleasure; Have you checked

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.2 host system tar version

2012-11-24 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/23/2012 07:33 PM, nettxzl wrote: (Sorry if this comes through twice. My first attempt seems to have vanished.) Hi, I was starting the gcc-4.7.1 (Pass 1) build in Chap. 5 and I was trying to unpack the files compressed with xz following the command given there: tar -Jxf

Re: [lfs-support] LFS network configuration for internet access

2012-11-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/16/2012 01:07 AM, Oshadha Gunawardena wrote: Hi all, Since I have completed building complete LFS system now I want to configure it's network in order to access internet. I have read through robbat2 take new kernel, copy old config to .config robbat2 make oldconfig robbat2 answer

Re: [lfs-support] Use a newer kernel than specified?

2012-11-14 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/14/2012 04:59 AM, Smith, Mitchell wrote: Hi, The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2 Obviously the later releases would contain multiple fixes and security improvements. Any reason why using the latest 3.5.X release (Currently 3.5.7) would cause any issues

Re: [lfs-support] GCC-4.7.1 - Pass 2 Error unrecognized command line option '-V' unrecognized command line option '-qversion'

2012-11-12 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, lei huang wrote: Linux 2.6.18-308.16.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Oct 2 22:01:37 EDT 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config.log FATAL: kernel too old help!!! There's the problem - your host system doesn't have a recent enough kernel. You will need to upgrade the kernel to at

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

2012-11-10 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/10/2012 07:14 AM, Prabhu wrote: (5.5.1 Installation of cross GCC) I successfully compiled Binutilities, then I untared the GCC. In GCC folder I done the following steps *tar -Jxf ../mpfr-3.1.1.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr tar -Jxf ../gmp-5.0.5.tar.xz mv -v gmp-5.0.5 gmp tar -zxf

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 Section 6.4 Chroot Error

2012-11-10 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote: I also get a problem at this point chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin/bash --login +h /tools/bin/env: /tools/bin/bash: Permission denied root@cpu:/home/yan/lfs# ll

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 Section 6.4 Chroot Error

2012-11-10 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/10/2012 09:22 PM, yan wrote: On Sat 10 Nov 2012 11:09:08 PM CST, Chris Staub wrote: On 11/10/2012 10:05 AM, yan wrote: I also get a problem at this point chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin /tools/bin

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

2012-11-09 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/09/2012 12:30 PM, Prabhu wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me an error message says that Please clarify

Re: [lfs-support] libmpfr error while compiling GCC.

2012-11-09 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/10/2012 01:49 AM, Prabhu wrote: Hi, I'm trying to compile GCC, I done with untaring (MPFR,GMP and MPC ) and moving the files to its respected folders, and even configuration part also done. but while making the Gcc its throwing me an error message says that *checking for

Re: [lfs-support] What Is The LFS Partition?

2012-11-06 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/06/2012 03:21 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan wrote: Bruce wrote: Why does one have to create a directory with that name before executing the mount command? The system has to know where to attach the data structures in the file tree. You could create a script to do a 'mkdir -p mountpoint;

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

2012-11-06 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/06/2012 08:13 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: On 11/5/12, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com wrote: I see numerous similar lines in your output - basically, it appears to be looking in /bin and /lib for gcc files, rather than /usr/{bin,lib}. To be honest, I'm not really sure why that is. Does ls

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

2012-11-06 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: On 11/6/12, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com wrote: Installing GCC into /usr certainly shouldn't create any directories or files in /bin or /lib. Do you have logs of your GCC installation? Only of the installation as root, as all the previous files

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

2012-11-06 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/06/2012 09:19 PM, Chris Staub wrote: On 11/06/2012 09:11 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: Only of the installation as root, as all the previous files were deleted. Here is my config.log: http://sprunge.us/QUHB I can provide any other files from the installation if requested. configure

Re: [lfs-support] Not set up to use the correct startfiles at the 6.17 sanity check

2012-11-05 Thread Chris Staub
On 11/05/2012 09:10 PM, Harry Prevor wrote: This is my second LFS build, but it's been a while. This time I'm trying to build with Package Users as described in this hint: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/more_control_and_pkg_man.txt For the sanity check at 6.17

Re: [lfs-support] How to know how many packages are installed?

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Staub
On 10/31/2012 04:04 AM, gmspro wrote: Is there any way to know how many packages are installed? Is it possible to know if a package is installed or not? Thanks. See the page in the LFS book on Package Management - http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/pkgmgt.html --

Re: [lfs-support] glibc-2.16.0 build issue LFS-BOOK-7.2

2012-10-22 Thread Chris Staub
On 10/22/2012 02:04 PM, Gaurav Goel wrote: Hi, I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2. While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors: -- root:/sources#

Re: [lfs-support] Ch6 coreutils

2012-10-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 10/11/2012 03:42 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote: I got this: ./bld: line 16: /usr/bin/mv: No such file or directory when I ran my script for coreutils. I navigated to the /usr/bin directory of the chroot enironment and there is no mv file or directory. Any ideas? Also, if you want to see my

Re: [lfs-support] bash 6.33

2012-10-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 10/11/2012 09:14 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote: I ran my script( http://pastebin.com/95jDZ7ds ) for chapter 6.33 Bash-4.2 and the prompt ended up just being bash and thus never seeing my FLAG file or GOOD being echoed to the screen. Was my script still successful? I'M thinking that it was and

Re: [lfs-support] Host System Versions

2011-12-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/25/2011 03:20 AM, Corey Richardson wrote: Under 'Host System Requirements', it says minimum versions. It lists kernel 2.6.25, but later on chapter 8 it says kernel 3.1. Is it safe to assume that 3.1+ is fine? Should I stick as close to those program's version numbers as possible or is

Re: [lfs-support] help LFS 6.0 Ch 5.7.1 glibc-2.14.1 configure: error: gcc must provide the cpuid.h header

2011-12-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/15/2011 02:18 AM, Henk Teijema wrote: Guess I overlooked The LiveCD cannot be used to build LFS 7.0 or later. So what liveCD should I use then? Met vriendelijke groet, Henk Just download any fairly recent distro...Fedora, Ubuntu, etc...and if needed install whatever additional

Re: [lfs-support] 2nd Pass binutils install fails (LFS-dev)

2011-12-04 Thread Chris Staub
On 12/05/2011 01:27 AM, str1chn1n3 wrote: Hello All, It's unclear whether the email list is restricted to just the stable version-- if so, just say the word and I'll abandon DEV for STABLE. If not, I could use a hand figuring out the cause of an install failure. The details: 1) Building to a

Re: [lfs-support] 2nd Pass binutils install fails (LFS-dev)

2011-12-04 Thread Chris Staub
Whenever I attempt to install as user lfs sans sudo, I get 'Permission denied' for the target directory. That's why lfs is sudoed. Any thoughts why this might be happening? (Btw, that's the reason for the indirect toolchain adjustment.) That means you've missed something earlier in the

Re: some issues with grub

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Staub
On 07/07/2010 01:56 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: 2.) the configuration file example given talks about Be careful not to change the 'exec tail' line above. . But the example does not contain a exec tail line. However, this line is important. May be something is missing

Re: How to skip two settings

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote: Hi, When system starting, there are two settings, namely 'regional settings' and 'edit settings', at which the process of starting will pause and I have to press enter key twice to finish them. Is there any configurations by which I can skip them

Re: How to skip two settings

2010-06-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/16/2010 01:11 PM, Parmenides wrote: 2010/6/16 Chris Staubch...@beaker67.com: On 06/16/2010 05:34 AM, Parmenides wrote: Yes, this is the effect of a live CD indeed. But, I have clone the live CD onto a partition of hard disk, and tried to altenate some default settings of it. Well,

Re: LFS (Version SVN-20100529) - 5.19. File-5.04

2010-06-15 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/14/2010 06:43 AM, Face wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:25 PM, littlebatdashing.m...@gmail.com wrote: It seems you have missed something, I remember we should always use non-root user (lfs) to compile LFS in chapter 5 at least. See:

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

2010-06-12 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/12/2010 01:55 AM, Face Man wrote: well, I think i should start over however i would like to know if this what i need to do in chapter 5.8 and 5.9 cd binutils-2.20.1 rm -R ../binutils-build # I am not sure i need to remove this Um... If this means that

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

2010-06-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/11/2010 11:35 PM, Face Man wrote: appreciated. First, the host system isn't an issue in Chapter 6. Second, Glibc does not need Autoconf. The error is complaining about ld. What is the output of readelf -l /tools/bin/ld | grep interpret --

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

2010-06-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/12/2010 12:51 AM, Face Man wrote: root:/sources/glibc-build# readelf -l /tools/bin/ld | grep interpretreadelf: Error: '/tools/bin/ld': No such file What's the output of find /tools -name 'ld* --

Re: Linux From Scratch (Version SVN-20100529) - 6.9. Glibc-2.11.2

2010-06-11 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/12/2010 01:04 AM, Face Man wrote: root:/sources/glibc-build# find /tools -name 'ld*' /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld /tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld-old /tools/bin/ldd /tools/bin/ld-old /tools/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld I'm not seeing a /tools/bin/ld. Looks like you've

Re: perl, gdbm and perl's obsequious help

2010-06-03 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/03/2010 11:33 AM, Neal Murphy wrote: On Thursday 03 June 2010 04:08:33 Simon Geard wrote: Curious... like Chris, I routinely build LFS from a host with gdbm installed (i.e LFS itself), and never observed any problems relating to perl. Indeed, even on completed LFS install, /usr/bin/perl

Re: LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

2010-06-02 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/02/2010 08:05 PM, Paul Rogers wrote: I don't see that the necessity of using a relatively recent version of the kernel in the host environment to be, in spirit, any different from requiring a relatively recent version of a C compiler. If all you have is a KR C compiler, then the

Re: perl, gdbm and perl's obsequious help

2010-06-02 Thread Chris Staub
On 06/02/2010 05:22 PM, Neal Murphy wrote: Some time back (LFS 6.4), I discovered that perl's configure program can poison the build; it is designed to be extremely helpful by ferreting out features of the host system to support. Specifically in my case, because it found libgdbm on the host

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

2010-05-27 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/27/2010 06:30 AM, xinglp wrote: 6.53. Psmisc-22.11 ln -sv killall /bin/pidof 6.56. Sysvinit-2.86 sysvinit-2.86/src/Makefile:126 ln -sf ../sbin/killall5 $(ROOT)/bin/pidof Not sure what you're trying to show about Sysvinit's instructions (some explanation

Re: /bin/pidof error sym link in 6.53

2010-05-27 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/27/2010 01:38 PM, xinglp wrote: Install sysvinit-2.86 overwrite /bin/pidof. No it doesn't. The instruction to create a /bin/pidof symlink on the Psmisc page is explicitly described as something to add if you *don't* install Sysvinit... If Sysvinit will not be used for a particular

Re: Glibc make fails with Error 2

2010-05-23 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/24/2010 12:45 AM, Kyle Brennan wrote: I solved the original error (it was a symlink problem with the gcc stem) and i got another error: mv -f /mnt/lfs/build/glibc-build/shlib.ldsT /mnt/lfs/build/glibc-build/shlib.lds i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -shared -static-libgcc -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,defs

Re: 6.32 Inetutils-1.7: make error: telnetd link sees Undefined 'tgetent'

2010-05-20 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/21/2010 01:06 AM, Bill Brown wrote: LFS ver 6.6: chapter 6.32 while making inetutils-1.7 I get the following error: utility.o: In function `terminaltypeok': /sources/inetutils-1.7/telnetd/utility.c:825: undefined reference to `tgetent' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]:

Re: Make error in glibc

2010-05-05 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/05/2010 07:33 AM, Simon Geard wrote: On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 07:54 +0530, gaurav k wrote: I have not deviated from the book at all, the only possible difference might be any differences in the host system requirement. For example, /bin/sh is not a symlink to bash, but I've only used bash

Re: 6.21 E2fsprogs-1.41.10 101 Tests failured -make check

2010-05-04 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/04/2010 06:28 PM, Bill Brown wrote: I have spend a good day trying to figure out the cause of all tests failing except for the first two and last two when issuing the 'make check' command; I am using the 6.6 version of the LFS book. Running on Ubuntu desktop 9.10. Which in turn is a

Re: Make error in glibc

2010-05-04 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/05/2010 12:57 AM, gaurav k wrote: I'm inside the extracted glibc directory, and this is what I do: $mkdir -v ../glibc-build $cd ../glibc-build $echo CFLAGS += -march=i486 -mtune=native configparams Assuming this is a literal copy of what you actually typed, this is incorrect. It's

Re: Make error in glibc

2010-05-03 Thread Chris Staub
On 05/03/2010 10:24 PM, gaurav k wrote: Hey Guys, This is my first mail to the list- I'm a relative newbie- though not a complete Linux noob who is clueless about what is happening. I have not deviated from the book at all, the only possible difference might be any differences in the host

Re: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

2010-04-28 Thread Chris Staub
On 04/28/2010 12:42 PM, Elmar Fahrendorff wrote: Hi, I try to set up an LFS-System (Book Version 6.5). The System starts and the login messages is displayed. But at boot time the systems shows errors that some modules can't be loaded: Usbcore: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout

Re: config.guess: unable to guess system type

2010-04-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 04/26/2010 10:42 AM, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi, I'm using LFS book 6.6 and try build lfs on a debian etch. I think I've done everything as described. I also downloaded the newest config scripts from git.savannah.gnu.org but the message remains the same... Any idea? Thanks There

Re: glibc compiling problem in lfs 6.6

2010-04-13 Thread Chris Staub
On 04/13/2010 12:04 PM, Jordan Peters wrote: When i compile glibc, it seems to go fine but when i test it, rather than the output in the terminal being [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2] it's [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] and this

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-31 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/31/2010 04:06 PM, Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: Hi All, OK, then libssp is not supposed to be linked, then why isn't somebody asking the obvious question? In the original post Pete wrote: It seems that libssp is suppose to be pulled in by the gcc option '-fstack-protector' so

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-31 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/31/2010 04:22 PM, Chris Staub wrote: On 03/31/2010 04:06 PM, Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: Hi All, OK, then libssp is not supposed to be linked, then why isn't somebody asking the obvious question? In the original post Pete wrote: It seems that libssp is suppose to be pulled

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-31 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/31/2010 04:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Szabolcs Gyalókay wrote: gcc res_hconf.c -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -g -Wstrict-prototypes -DIS_IN_nscd=1 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fpie -fstack-protector -DNOT_IN_libc=1 -o

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc `__stack_chk_guard' work around.

2010-03-30 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/30/2010 12:05 AM, x2...@lycos.com wrote: Hi, This is the work around i'm using. I don't know if it will help on x86_64. Assuming your compilation stopped at the line 'linking' object files to produce 'nscd': Paste up the 'linking' line that

Re: Psmisc-22.10 broken symlink

2010-03-30 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/30/2010 01:05 AM, Rick Shelton wrote: I think I found a little problem with the instructions in the book here. LFS 6.6 Ch 6.52. Psmisc-22.10 ./configure --prefix=/usr make make install ln -sv killall /bin/pidof root:/sources/psmisc-22.10# ln -sv killall /bin/pidof `/bin/pidof' -

Re: Errors when running glibc-2.11-1 tests in section 6.9.

2010-03-28 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/28/2010 02:00 AM, jumbophut wrote: I have a significant number of errors when testing the build of glibc-2.11.1 in section 6.9 of the book. I would be grateful if people could advise whether these are a problem before I go on. Output of 'grep Error glibc-check-log': make[2]: ***

Re: Bios Call Help

2010-03-28 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/28/2010 09:29 AM, Yasin Yenidunya wrote: hi all, i have a boot code like below and i would like to add e820 bios call to print memory information to screen. first i add 0xe8 to ah then 20 to al and i call int 0x15 but it gives error on int. does anyone has any idea? or guide me?

Re: Help: but there didn't have Bison-1.875 and Gawk-3.0

2010-03-28 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/28/2010 10:02 AM, AOL wrote: Good day. Please excuse my English. I am trying establish LFS, my host-system is gNewSense. Apparently it's enough (gNewSense), but there didn't have Bison-1.875 and Gawk-3.0, required in Chapter vii. Host System Requirements, Linux From Scratch - Version

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-27 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/27/2010 05:27 AM, Simon Geard wrote: Hey, calm down a moment, Chris. Nobody is disputing that. I'd say stosss certainly is, but then why should I care what he thinks...yeah you're right, guess I just need to calm down... But while making things understandable might be your goal,

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 07:04 AM, John Stephens wrote: Chris, Thanks for the reply. I've spent a lot of time in chapters 4 and 5. I'm finding the book (6.6) a little unclear in certain areas which is probably what is throwing me off to some degree. For example, look at 5.5.1, first box. It says:

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 09:54 AM, John Stephens wrote: Chris and Phillippe, Thanks for the insights. Like I stated before, I was either missing something conceptually or misinterpreting something. I took the instructions The GCC documentation recommends building GCC outside of the source directory

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 09:22 PM, Simon Geard wrote: Well, if we're seeing people being confused by what 'source directory' refers to in this case, it's probably worth trying to clarify it a little. Even a single-word change like the following might help: The GCC documentation recommends building

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 10:00 PM, Chris Staub wrote: On 03/26/2010 09:22 PM, Simon Geard wrote: The GCC documentation recommends building GCC outside of it's source directory in a dedicated build directory. To me, replacing the with it's makes is much clearer that it refers to GCC's

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 10:56 PM, stosss wrote: When I first went through the book it was very confusing. After just doing it and not knowing if I was doing it right, and having done it right and having built several systems that work, now the confusion is gone. For first time readers there are

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-26 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/26/2010 11:36 PM, stosss wrote: You really have a bad attitude. I wasn't being insulting. You are the worst one when it comes to be caustic toward any suggestions. Your reply is always, the book is clear. You are also quick to say, you did something wrong you didn't read some part of

Re: Unable to compile GCC-4.4.3, Pass 1

2010-03-25 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/25/2010 10:45 PM, John Stephens wrote: Greetings, I am attempting to build my first LFS project, but can't see to get past the GCC, pass 1 compile. FWIW, Linux is not new to me. I have had an interest in working through a LFS project for several years, and now I actually have some

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc compile stopped with `__stack_chk_guard'

2010-03-24 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/25/2010 12:16 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Mike, That's a little strong. There is an error somewhere, but don't assume that the deviation is intentional. -- Bruce I think that's a fair assumption, given the pretty much to the letter wording used (emphasis on the first 2 words).

Re: Bk6.6Ch6.9 glibc compile stopped with `__stack_chk_guard'

2010-03-24 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/24/2010 11:55 PM, x2...@lycos.com wrote: ldd /usr/sbin/nscd linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7fd2000) libssp.so.0 = not found librt.so.1 = /lib/librt.so.1 (0xb7fc8000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7faf000) libnsl.so.1 =

write error with new version of tar

2010-03-19 Thread Chris Staub
I started a new build of current dev LFS, and noticed some strange behavior from tar once inside chroot. Using tar 1.23, attempting to pipe its tf output through head results in a tar: write error. In other words... tar -tjf /home/sources/glibc-2.11.1.tar.bz2 | head -n1 glibc-2.11.1/

Re: Unable to boot LFS... Help me

2010-03-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/13/2010 03:32 AM, Sathya Narayana.R wrote: Hello, I finished my LFS 6.5 along with package user system. After completing the installation of grub and everything, i booted into the new system. It shows the following errors... /sysmount: only root can do that grep: /proc/mounts: No

Re: Since we are talking USB

2010-03-16 Thread Chris Staub
On 03/16/2010 11:56 PM, brown wrap wrote: I was never able to resolve my USB problem. Here is the output of lspci -v: The system boots up, seems to recognize the USB ports, but then gets errors in the sys.log: http://pastebin.com/eKZ5GycV From sys.log... # Inspecting

  1   2   3   4   5   >