Great, glibc 2.19 is working fine.
Also, the first two 'sed' lines - static and make - can be removed
because those issues are resolved in the new version. I did not created
any other change. Maybe have a look at the locales for the bss chain.
ef2progs - due to the introduction of using a build
Greetings,
I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin
LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18.
//home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:42: undefined
reference to `xdrstdio_create' /
/collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status /
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:08 AM, William Darryl Jackson
wm.djack...@comcast.net wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin
LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18.
*/home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:42:
William Darryl Jackson wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to get glibc installed on my system, so I can continue/begin
LFS. I get the same error from Glibc versions 2-17, and 18.
//home/william/Downloads/glibc-2.18/nis/nis_file.c:42: undefined
reference to `xdrstdio_create' /
Research says it
Le 12/01/2014 22:37, William Darryl Jackson a écrit :
Never mind, I just answered my own question. I remember Debian did not
show Glibc as a package, and I loaded eglibc-source, but apparently it
is not sufficient. Need to find Glibc-2.5.1 - maybe from another Debian
repository, or compile
My Chapter 6 glibc check gave four errors. Three of them
(getaddrinfo4, annexc and run-conformtest) are expected but
the fourth in globtest is not mentioned in the book. Here is the
immediate context:
/bin/sh globtest.sh /sources/glibc-build/
' /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the
posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a
requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at work - so I will
check later.
That is interesting. And very puzzling. For me, I
Hello experts,
I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4, built on a
host system of slackware-14.
All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not the errors
in the glibc fall into the acceptable variety or not.
glibc appeared to build well enough.
Le 28/10/2013 14:07, Richard a écrit :
[...]
Any advice would be welcome.
I cannot tell you much about what the tests. Are you sure they did not
run to completion?
I am also assuming that glibc is one of the packages that can safely be
installed to a fake root - then tarballed 'slackware
Richard wrote:
Hello experts,
I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4,
built on a host system of slackware-14.
All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not
the errors in the glibc fall into the acceptable variety or not.
glibc appeared to
On Mon, 28/10/13, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I have inferred from the book that 'cputimer1' and 'run-conformtest'
might be 'acceptable' failures, but I was surprised that the test
suite ended mid-way.
It didn't. It finished running.
Aha! I see. So I just misinterpreted
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:07:32PM +, Richard wrote:
Hello experts,
I am attempting my first LFS build; which will (hopefully) be 7.4, built on a
host system of slackware-14.
All went well up until chapter 6. I am unsure as to whether or not the errors
in the glibc fall into the
On Mon, 28/10/13, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I have inferred from the book that 'cputimer1' and 'run-conformtest' might
be 'acceptable' failures, but I was surprised that the test suite ended
mid-way.
Why do you think it ended mid-way ? Your output from the make
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:25:02PM +, Richard wrote:
I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the
posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a
requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at work - so I will
check
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:25:02PM +, Richard wrote:
I think I neglected to shut down the networking on the host system - so the
posix tests did not fail. I did not realise that network isolation was a
requirement. I do not have that machine with me here at work - so I
In fact, I don't think it conducted any tests.
The commands I use in the glibc-build directory come right out of the book
make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
I do call them from a function defined in a build.conf file called
check_commands, but that shouldn't
On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
What as the output when running make -k check?
Sincerely,
William Harrington
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 12:28 -0400, Dave wrote:
When compiling and testing Glibc
I've noticed in the configure line the option
'--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel?
Short version, because it has to work with the kernel you're running
during the build, not just the one
When compiling and testing Glibc
I've noticed in the configure line the option
'--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel?
I've noticed that when it installs, I kept getting a compile error on
one of the checks. Changed HOSTTYPE to x86_64, and it compiles now.
can you
On Aug 24, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Dave wrote:
When compiling and testing Glibc
I've noticed in the configure line the option
'--enable-kernel=2.6.32'. Why this when its a 3.10.9 kernel?
Because not everyone builds hosts running a 3.10.9 kernel. Reference
this:
Linux From Scratch - Version 7.3 Chapter 6. Installing Basic System Software -
6.9. Glibc-2.17 at Ubuntu LTS 12.04
Based on this words on LFS 7.3 Book
(Generally a few tests do not pass, but you can generally ignore any of the
test failures listed below. Now test the build results:)
can I
Hi,
I successfully chrooted my target machine and I passed all the way upto
man-page installation, and I stepped into glibc(chapter 6.9). I performed
all the steps till make without any error after entering the make check
command Its giving me an error.
COMMAND ENTERED*:
make -k check 21 | tee
On 12/18/2012 08:25 AM, Prabhu wrote:
Hi,
Since its a check, I ignored it and I performed with the next step
that's *make install* even this fails and throw me an error as
*
*ERROR*:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
On Dec 16, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Michael E. Maher wrote:
‘--enable-kernel=version’
This option is currently only useful on GNU/Linux systems. The
version parameter should have the form X.Y.Z and describes the
smallest
version of the Linux kernel the generated library is expected to
support.
Thank you all.
After I reconfigure */bin/sh*, I now successfully built *glibc* .
sudo dpkg-reconfigure dash
Thank you all
Pei
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 13:19 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Michael:
Thank you
Hi, all:
Refer to
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel
*--enable-kernel=2.6.25 \*
Does this refer to the installed kernel? Should 2.6.25 be the same as the
Linux kernel
Hi, all:
After successfully built
binutils
gcc
linux-kernel
now, I'm following
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
to build glibc. *make *brings me the following errors:
*make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/csu'*
*make[1]: ***
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 04:30 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
Refer
to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
glibc-2.16.0 configuration, the version of enabled kernel
--enable-kernel=2.6.25 \
Does this
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 04:47 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
After successfully built
binutils
gcc
linux-kernel
now, I'm
following http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/glibc.html
to build glibc. make brings me the following errors:
make[2]: Leaving
Hi, Michael:
Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
My* **Host System Requirements* gives me the following result:
*root@peijia-GA-870A-UD3:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build# cat
version-check.sh EOF*
* #!/bin/bash*
* # Simple script to list version numbers of critical
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 13:19 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Michael:
Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
My Host System Requirements gives me the following result:
...
root@peijia-GA-870A-UD3:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build# bash
version-check.sh
bash, version
JIA Pei wrote:
*/bin/sh - /bin/dash*
This *will* create problems when building glibc. It needs to be bash.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 14:46 +, Michael E. Maher wrote:
Hi Pei,
The '--enable-kernel' parameter specifies the minimum version of the
Linux kernel required to run the resulting glibc.
And to elaborate - the minimum kernel version you need to support isn't
the one you're installing, it's
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 13:19 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, Michael:
Thank you very much for your detailed reply, so clear !!
My Host System Requirements gives me the following result:
Note - that script isn't something you just run. It's something you have
to actually read the output of, and
@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc make error “cant find -lgcc_eh”
Hi Prabhu,
Looks like your compiler (linker actually) cannot find the 'gcc_eh'
library:
cannot find -lgcc_eh collect2:error: ld returned 1 exit status
This library isn't set up when doing the GCC build, so
the book copies the rpc headers to the host system. to avoid changeing
the host, i use the same sed as in chapter 6
sed -e 's#rpc/types.h#rpc/types.h#' \
-i sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c
i guess this should be changed in the book
tobias
--
Tobias Gasser wrote:
the book copies the rpc headers to the host system. to avoid changeing
the host, i use the same sed as in chapter 6
sed -e 's#rpc/types.h#rpc/types.h#' \
-i sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c
i guess this should be changed in the book
Possibly, but the book is really only
Am 12.11.2012 19:15, schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
Possibly, but the book is really only adding some headers to the host
system. The problem should only come up when using LFS-7.1 as a host.
ok. not really a problem.
except for the system requirements like {d,b}ash or {g,}awk there is no
other
Hi,
I try to build glibc 2.16.0 with the Linux From Scratch 7.2 (Chapter 5.7)
and it don't work :
make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/math'
gcc ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64/s_isnan.c -c -std=gnu99
-fgnu89-inline -fno-stack-protector -O2 -Wall -Winline
Adrien Vasseur wrote:
Hi,
I try to build glibc 2.16.0 with the Linux From Scratch 7.2 (Chapter 5.7)
and it don't work :
make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.16.0/math'
../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64/s_isnan.c:30:1: error: '__EI___isnan'
aliased to external symbol
Wow ! Very fast reply !
I run the script in the Host System Prerequisites and I have :
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22.90.20120924
bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
Coreutils:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:50:16PM +0200, Adrien Vasseur wrote:
Wow ! Very fast reply !
I run the script in the Host System Prerequisites and I have :
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
That will break it. /bin/sh needs to be bash.
I think the others looked ok. Please
Adrien Vasseur wrote:
Wow ! Very fast reply !
I run the script in the Host System Prerequisites and I have :
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22.90.20120924
bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
bzip2, Version
So I have :
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/bash
Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22.90.20120924
bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
/usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
Coreutils: 8.13
diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2
find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2
GNU Awk 4.0.1
Adrien Vasseur wrote:
So I have :
bash, version 4.2.37(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/bash
Don't top post or you will stop getting responses. Also, trim things
that are not relevant.
And it doesn't work :
gcc ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64/s_isnan.c -c -std=gnu99
-fgnu89-inline
Hi,
I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2.
While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors:
--
./scripts/mkinstalldirs /temp-build/glibc-build/linkobj
mkdir
On 10/22/2012 02:04 PM, Gaurav Goel wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the LFS-BOOK-7.2.
While building glibc in section 6.9 I'm getting following errors:
--
root:/sources#
I got the following for gclibc, any ideas?
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0'
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find crt1.o: No such file or directory
Garrett Gaston wrote:
I got the following for gclibc, any ideas?
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0'
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find crt1.o: No such file or
On 09/27/2012 06:40 PM, Garrett Gaston wrote:
I got the following for gclibc, any ideas?
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/mnt/lfs/sources/Chapter-5/5.7._Glibc-2.16.0/glibc-2.16.0'
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-lfs-linux-gnu/4.7.1/../../../../i686-lfs-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
cannot find crt1.o:
Thanks. Do you happen to know exactly what chapter/page of LFS that this
symlink is created? Thanks.
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:05:01 -0400
From: baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] glibc
On 09/27/2012 06:40 PM, Garrett
Garrett Gaston wrote:
Thanks. Do you happen to know exactly what chapter/page of
LFS that this symlink is created? Thanks.
Section 4.2.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Den 21-09-2012 17:22, Bruce Dubbs skrev:
Thomas Jensen wrote:
In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with
following message:
checking for -z relro option... no
configure: error: linker with -z relro support required
Hi again
I tried one more time this
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 03:41:52PM +0200, Thomas Jensen wrote:
Den 21-09-2012 17:22, Bruce Dubbs skrev:
Thomas Jensen wrote:
In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with
following message:
checking for -z relro option... no
configure: error: linker with
Den 22-09-2012 17:09, Ken Moffat skrev:
Look through config.log in 'view' or 'less'. Find the error
message 'linker with -z relro support required', then look at the
lines before that (perhaps a couple of screens) to see what error
message was produced, probably by gcc or ld.
Thanks.
Hello
In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with
following message:
checking for -z relro option... no
configure: error: linker with -z relro support required
See complete output from configure in the end of this mail. I have also
uploaded config.log to
Thomas Jensen wrote:
Hello
In chapter 5.7 I get an error running configure. The script stop with
following message:
checking for -z relro option... no
configure: error: linker with -z relro support required
See complete output from configure in the end of this mail. I have also
uploaded
Hi;
Do you have any ideas on this?
Regards
*Aydın Demirel
--
Linux System Administrator*
*Endersys Consultancy and Software Ltd.*
*
*
2012/9/6 Aydın Demirel aydin...@gmail.com
Hi;
I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when
I execute
Hi William;
2012/9/7 William Harrington berzerk...@cox.net
On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote:
/opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(**
gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/**src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/**gethnamaddr.c:636:
more undefined references to
Hi again;
This is my mistake. I solved it re-compiling* gcc.
*
Regards
2012/9/7 Aydın Demirel aydin...@gmail.com
Hi William;
2012/9/7 William Harrington berzerk...@cox.net
On Sep 6, 2012, at 08:03 AM, Aydın Demirel wrote:
/opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-**build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(**
Hi;
I try to compile glibc-2.16 version. But I'm getting following error when I
execute make command:
/opt/newroot/src/build/glibc-build/resolv/libresolv_pic.a(gethnamaddr.os):/opt/newroot/src/glibc-2.16.0/resolv/gethnamaddr.c:636:
more undefined references to `__stack_chk_guard' follow
Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean?
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:40:03 -0500
From: bruce.du...@gmail.com
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] glibc pass 2 chapter-6
Garrett Gaston wrote:
Sorry, I'M talking about glibc in chapter 6
Garrett Gaston wrote:
Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean?
Are you really that ignorant? Try googling for 'top post', I'm feeling
lucky. Don't expect any more replies until you figure it out.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter 6
/bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h
sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h
termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h
wcsmbs/wchar.h
On 2012-08-19 19:56, Garrett Gaston wrote:
This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter
6
/bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h
sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h
termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h
Le dimanche 19 août à 17:21, Garrett Gaston a écrit :
Sorry, what does top post and trim replies mean?
'top post' means that you should not begin with your message but include it
inside as I am doing.
For triming, that's mean that you have to delete part of the message that
are out of span as
Garrett Gaston wrote:
This is what I got for the make -k check command for glibc on chapter 6
/bootparam.h sysvipc/sys/ipc.h sysvipc/sys/msg.h sysvipc/sys/sem.h
sysvipc/sys/shm.h termios/termios.h termios/sys/termios.h
termios/sys/ttychars.h
time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h
I have deviated from the book just a little. Instead of just typing the
commands I'M placing all the commands for each page in a script called bld and
running the script. In the script I'M appending each line with so what each
line will not proceed unless the previous line succeeded, in
Garrett Gaston wrote:
I have deviated from the book just a little. Instead of just typing
the commands I'M placing all the commands for each page in a script
called bld and running the script. In the script I'M appending each
line with so what each line will not proceed unless the previous
Garrett Gaston wrote:
Sorry, I'M talking about glibc in chapter 6. As for the directory
names, I don't recall using spaces, I did use _ where spaces would
have been but I don't remember using any spaces. So is there a good
reason I I never got my FLAG file or got GOOD echoed to the screen
Hello,
I'm building LFS 7.1 from the book. I'm running the tests on glib and I'm
getting a setlocale failed error in bug-regex32.
Any ideas on this ? Ok to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
Mike--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')
bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
bash: command substitution: line 45: `readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n
's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')'
root:/#
I seem to be having a
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Michael Robinson wrote:
root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n
's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')
bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
bash: command substitution: line 45: `readelf -l
Michael Robinson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:38 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Michael Robinson wrote:
root:/# DL=$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n
's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')
bash: command substitution: line 45: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
bash: command substitution: line
why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc?
as far i can understand, glibc will be built with the hosts compiler and
not with the new one build in 5.5 as the new one didn't install
reachable with the PATH-variable.
in 5.8 binutils and 5.9 gcc will be built with the new compiler by
specifying
On 6/21/2012 5:57 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc?
as far i can understand, glibc will be built with the hosts compiler and
not with the new one build in 5.5 as the new one didn't install
reachable with the PATH-variable.
in 5.8 binutils and 5.9 gcc
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:57:19 +0100
Tobias Gasser l...@ebp-gasser.ch wrote:
why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc?
To quote from the glibc page
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/glibc.html
--host=$LFS_TGT, --build=$(../glibc-2.15/scripts/config.guess)
Andrew Benton schrieb:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:57:19 +0100
Tobias Gasser l...@ebp-gasser.ch wrote:
why are the CC= AR= RANLIB= not set for glibc?
To quote from the glibc page
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/glibc.html
--host=$LFS_TGT,
On 5/16/2012 12:22 AM, lei huang wrote:
help help!!!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, lei huangcode.huang...@gmail.com wrote:
system: centos5.8 linux2.6.18 gcc44
lfs: binutils-2.22 gcc-4.7.0 glibc-2.15
lfs-man Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20120513
build glibc erro:
gcc44 -nostdlib
help help!!!
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, lei huang code.huang...@gmail.com wrote:
system: centos5.8 linux2.6.18 gcc44
lfs: binutils-2.22 gcc-4.7.0 glibc-2.15
lfs-man Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20120513
build glibc erro:
gcc44 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o
wcsmbs/wchar.h wctype/wctype.h /sources/glibc-build/begin-end-check.out
make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.5.1'
make: *** [check] Error 2
root:/sources/glibc-build#
what can I do now ? go on? Then, make install will error--
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486 option now?
--
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
during compilation; but why it is recommended -march=i486
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended to clear
ante wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
ante wrote:
Well, I try to ask it once more. Can anybody explain (or give me a link to
relevant discussion) why glibc should be compiled with -march=i486 option?
I remember that in LFS 5.0 it was recommended
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
It was added 09/15/07. See
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2018
Thank you.
--
ante
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Hello,
I try to find a reason for the following statement in the book:
Because Glibc no longer supports i386, its developers say to use
the compiler flag -march=i486 when building it for x86 machines.
I wasn't able to find such recommendation in documentation of glibc
(files README, INSTALL,
hi, i'm tryng to compile the glibc packtage but return a errror (2)
this is the log of configuration and compilation of packet:
lfs@pandaubuntu-RF511-RF411-RF711:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ case
`uname -m` in i?86) echo CFLAGS += -march=i486 -mtune=native
configparms ;; esac
Doing the building two or three times can only help me understand things
better.
Agreed
Anyway I wonder if anybody ever did the build right the first time, in only a
single go?
I Did... But then when it booted it yelled at me in black, white and in
COLOR [FAIL] [FAIL]
LOL Now I'm
@Jason: that's my approach as well, just roll with the blows...
(and go play GTA when I take a break - now _that's_ a lol!)
I've reached install of glibc again, this time the grep error-check is:
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: ***
Just a final check, I get the following result:
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64)
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/lib);
Is the *-unknown-* to be
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64)
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/lib);
Is the *-unknown-* to be expected?
I think that has to do with the export script
On 1/3/2012 5:24 AM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote:
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep 'SEARCH.*/usr/lib' dummy.log |sed 's|; |\n|g'
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64)
SEARCH_DIR(/tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib)
SEARCH_DIR(/lib);
Is the *-unknown-* to be
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 06:19:39 -0600
Eleanore Boyd cara...@cox.net wrote:
It should say x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu, no unknown factor. Something is
very wrong with associations, hostnames, or otherwise.
No, that's not true. After the second pass of gcc in chapter 5 it says
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
I don't know how to proceed, I get the following errors
when running: make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[1]: *** [csu/tests] Error 2
make[1]: *** [iconv/tests] Error 2
make[1]: *** [locale/tests] Error 2
make[3]: ***
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 06:13:55PM +0200, mais lfs wrote:
I don't know how to proceed, I get the following errors
when running: make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[1]: *** [csu/tests] Error 2
make[1]: *** [iconv/tests] Error 2
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Take a look in glibc-check-log from the *host* system.
Don't have 'less' available yet, so is using:
grep -B5 Error glibc-check-log
I know you don't
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
Take a look in glibc-check-log from the *host* system.
Don't have 'less'
On 02/01/12 21:48, mais lfs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
mailto:zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:57:49PM +0200, mais lfs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Ken Moffat
zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
Did you do the host system requirments in chapter preface
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/7.0/prologue/hostreqs.html
Yes, I remember I had to install bison, but something else I now remember,
I later had to install autotools on the host as well because something was
complaining about
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
