I think that really will help me remember. Thank you.
On Jan 7, 2013, at 2:50 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 09:06 -0500, Roy Birk wrote:
And I might have been better off copying and pasting. It's difficult to
tell the difference, in the book, between the
--- Em dom, 6/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
De: Fernando de Oliveira
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1
lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Data: Domingo, 6 de Janeiro de 2013, 9:09
I agree with you. However, I think that there must be a way
to reduce
user problems
AWK=`readlink -f /usr/bin/awk`
awk=/usr/bin/awk
[ $AWK == /usr/bin/gawk ] || die $awk is not a symlink to gawk
some distros started to drop the /usr hierarchy
the script should be a little smarter to accept the files not only in
/usr/bin but just anywhere in $PATH
something like
awk=$(
--- Em dom, 6/1/13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
De: Bruce Dubbs
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1
Para: LFS Support List
Data: Domingo, 6 de Janeiro de 2013, 1:09
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I like this. Output from
$ cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20120311
Here is another
--- Em dom, 6/1/13, Tobias Gasser escreveu:
De: Tobias Gasser
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1
Para: LFS Support List
Data: Domingo, 6 de Janeiro de 2013, 8:35
AWK=`readlink -f /usr/bin/awk`
awk=/usr/bin/awk
[ $AWK == /usr/bin/gawk ] || die $awk is not
a symlink
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 11:39 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The idea of the script was that it should be short. Generally the
problem is that the symlinks are not set and occasionally makeinfo is
not installed. Rarely is the problem an out-of-date executable.
My issue with the
And I might have been better off copying and pasting. It's difficult to tell
the difference, in the book, between the number one and the letter L (lower
case). I checked man pages and went with whichever seemed more sensible, but
got it wrong a couple of times with the -W1 option.
On Jan 6,
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 12:35 +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote:
AWK=`readlink -f /usr/bin/awk`
awk=/usr/bin/awk
[ $AWK == /usr/bin/gawk ] || die $awk is not a symlink to gawk
some distros started to drop the /usr hierarchy
Out of curiosity, which ones? The only one I know that's messing with
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 12:35 +0100, Tobias Gasser wrote:
AWK=`readlink -f /usr/bin/awk`
awk=/usr/bin/awk
[ $AWK == /usr/bin/gawk ] || die $awk is not a symlink to gawk
some distros started to drop the /usr hierarchy
the script should be a little smarter to accept the files not only in
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 09:06 -0500, Roy Birk wrote:
And I might have been better off copying and pasting. It's difficult to
tell the difference, in the book, between the number one and the letter
L (lower case). I checked man pages and went with whichever seemed more
sensible, but got it wrong
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 19:11 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
matthew gruda wrote:
the output of the version check script is:
bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
/bin/sh - /bin/dash
Fix this.
Bruce (and others), I think some improvement needs to be made to the
Requirements page in the book.
--- Em sáb, 5/1/13, Simon Geard escreveu:
De: Simon Geard
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1
Para: lfs-support
Data: Sábado, 5 de Janeiro de 2013, 8:40
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 19:11 -0600,
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
matthew gruda wrote:
the output of the version check script
My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of
LFS, was that the last line:
gcc compilation OK
that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines were
telling me that I had requirements to fix.
I thought: all right, host can compile, so the other lines are
Tobias Gasser wrote:
My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of
LFS, was that the last line:
gcc compilation OK
that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines were
telling me that I had requirements to fix.
I thought: all right, host can
On 01/05/2013 07:35 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I have recurrently written about this, here.
My error with this page, even after having built one or two versions of
LFS, was that the last line:
gcc compilation OK
that made me ignore the other lines, when some of these lines were
Am 05.01.2013 18:39, schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
The idea of the script was that it should be short. Generally the
problem is that the symlinks are not set and occasionally makeinfo is
not installed. Rarely is the problem an out-of-date executable.
agree.
so why not check just the very important
Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 05.01.2013 18:39, schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
The idea of the script was that it should be short. Generally the
problem is that the symlinks are not set and occasionally makeinfo is
not installed. Rarely is the problem an out-of-date executable.
agree.
so why not check
--- Em sáb, 5/1/13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
De: Bruce Dubbs
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] can't compile gcc pass 1
Para: LFS Support List
Data: Sábado, 5 de Janeiro de 2013, 21:24
Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 05.01.2013 18:39, schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
The idea of the script was that it should
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I like this. Output from
$ cat /etc/lfs-release
SVN-20120311
Here is another version. I can't say I really like it. The original is
40 lines and this is 73. All this because users either don't have
enough experience to understand what's there now or because a
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 11:39 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
The idea of the script was that it should be short. Generally the
problem is that the symlinks are not set and occasionally makeinfo is
not installed. Rarely is the problem an out-of-date executable.
My issue with the script isn't
On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 22:09 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Here is another version. I can't say I really like it. The original is
40 lines and this is 73. All this because users either don't have
enough experience to understand what's there now or because a user
(generally experienced) just
When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
checking for complex.h... yes
checking for library containing creal... -lm
checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking for
matthew gruda wrote:
When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
checking for complex.h... yes
checking for library containing creal... -lm
checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
matthew gruda wrote:
When I try to compile gcc from 5.5 I get this after running make:
checking for complex.h... yes
checking for library containing creal... -lm
checking whether creal, cimag and I can be used...
matthew gruda wrote:
checking for MPFR... no
configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI (including
static vs shared).
make[1]: *** [configure-mpc] Error 1
and still getting the error
OK, you are not unpacking the tarballs properly. It's not finding mpfr.
That's explained
25 matches
Mail list logo
