On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 14:23 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> >
> > There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
> > a couple of paragraphs grumbling about dbus, and a claim that it'll be
> > released some time last
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
> a couple of paragraphs grumbling about dbus, and a claim that it'll be
> released some time last year or this one. Looks like vapourware to me -
Looks like unreleas
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 20:16 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> Ok. I know about skabus, but it's not clear whether it will be able to
> function as drop-in replacement for dbus. I would love to get rid of
> dbus completelly.
There's no information on the site, no source code, mailing lists - just
a cou
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:35 PM, TheOldFellow wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow
>> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I misled you. I don't have one right now, but I'm thinking of using
> this when it's released.
> http://skarnet.org/software/skabus/
>
> In the
Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote:
>>
>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
>>
> Richard,
>
> Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to
> use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I b
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 14:47 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote:
> >
> > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
> >
> Richard,
>
> Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus?
There are none - if something needs dbus, it
TheOldFellow wrote:
> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is
> being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd
> compiles?
>
> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
You may find
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
>
Richard,
Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to
use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I believe
(speaking from memory) that
Armin K. wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote:
>> 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow :
>>> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
>>> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
>>>
>>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote:
> 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow :
>> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
>> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
>>
>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternative
sorry for typo. :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow :
> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
>
> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
>
> Richard.
Viceversa, I'd like to know
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow :
> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
>
> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
>
> Richard.
Viceversa, I'd like to know
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being
avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles?
I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives.
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.li
14 matches
Mail list logo
