binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread Bill Cunningham
The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me that the assembler is too old? Huh? B -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html

Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread William Immendorf
On Aug 6, 2011 1:45 AM, Bill Cunningham bill...@suddenlink.net wrote: The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me that the assembler is too old? Huh? And this is why we build our own copies of Binutils

Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread Bill Cunningham
William Immendorf wrote: On Aug 6, 2011 1:45 AM, Bill Cunningham bill...@suddenlink.net wrote: The latest LFS livecd has binutils 2.17 which is require to build glibc-2.13 but when I try to run the configure script it tells me that the assembler is too old? Huh? And this is why we

Re: binutils [II]

2011-08-06 Thread William Immendorf
FYI: It really helps if you actually understand us and the list, and the book. On Aug 6, 2011 2:58 PM, Bill Cunningham bill...@suddenlink.net wrote: Mixing versions? What is FBBG? FBBG = Follow Book, Book Good I said you were mixing versions because you were building Glibc 2.13 (LFS 6.8)