I am running my first install with Ubuntu 11.10 and have stuck to the LFS
7.0 book. When I run the
cp -v ../glibc-2.14.1/iconvdata/gconv-modules iconvdata
make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
commands on 6.9, I get errors at the end...
make: *** [check] Error 2
Jim Washko wrote:
I am running my first install with Ubuntu 11.10 and have stuck to the LFS
7.0 book. When I run the
cp -v ../glibc-2.14.1/iconvdata/gconv-modules iconvdata
make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
grep Error glibc-check-log
commands on 6.9, I get errors at the end...
Intel x32... I'll keep searching.. I have not seen too much on these
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 29, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim Washko wrote:
I am running my first install with Ubuntu 11.10 and have stuck to the LFS
7.0 book. When I run the
cp -v
Hello,
I'm using LFS book version 6.8 and my host system is Fedora 14 i686. After
compiling glibc in chapter 6.9 I get two errors:
# make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: ***
Lázaro Morales wrote:
Hello,
I'm using LFS book version 6.8 and my host system is Fedora 14 i686. After
compiling glibc in chapter 6.9 I get two errors:
# make -k check 21 | tee glibc-check-log
# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1
En 21/11/2011 12:30:33, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com escribió:
Yes.
-- Bruce
Thanks very much.
Regards,
Lázaro.
Este mensaje de correo electrónico ha sido procesado por el servidor de
Frioclima
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On 02/11/10 20:41, David Shaw wrote:
I just want to quickly check that the following is acceptable from the
glibc check before I move on.
Many thanks,
David Shaw
root:/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build/stdio-common/bug22.out]
I just want to quickly check that the following is acceptable from the
glibc check before I move on.
Many thanks,
David Shaw
root:/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build/stdio-common/bug22.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [stdio-common/tests]
David Shaw wrote:
I just want to quickly check that the following is acceptable from the
glibc check before I move on.
root:/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-2.12.1-build/stdio-common/bug22.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [stdio-common/tests]
On 02/11/10 21:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I don't recall seeing this error. It would be helpful to see what the
contents of bug22.out are, however, the test has:
FILE *fp = fopen (/dev/null, w);
if (fp == NULL)
{
puts (cannot open /dev/null);
return 1;
}
Have you mounted /dev
Hi,
I am trying to install LFS version 6.5 on a machine with a mainboard VIA
EPIA-M and a CPU VIA C3 which the producer declares as X686 compatible and
my goal is obtaining a very lean system.
I have some doubts about the declared compatibility of the CPU because when
I tried to install Slackware
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Louis Davies davieslingr...@gmail.com wrote:
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-float.out] Error 132
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-double.out] Error 132
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/math/test-ldouble.out] Error 132
make[2]: ***
Louis Davies wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install LFS version 6.5 on a machine with a mainboard VIA
EPIA-M and a CPU VIA C3 which the producer declares as X686 compatible and
my goal is obtaining a very lean system.
I have some doubts about the declared compatibility of the CPU because when
I
On 24 February 2010 18:28, Louis Davies davieslingr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install LFS version 6.5 on a machine with a mainboard VIA
EPIA-M and a CPU VIA C3 which the producer declares as X686 compatible and
my goal is obtaining a very lean system.
I have some doubts about the
On 07/01/07 22:05:32, Ken Moffat wrote:
If you had multiple machines/systems, I'd be interested in hearing
your experiences after upgrading glibc. But, if this is your sole
system, your priority should probably be to keep something usable.
At the very least, make sure you can recover from
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 04:49:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Ken!
I did the upgrade, just a bit different than I was told to. I gave up on my
old SuSE and used that partition to test my bakup tarballs change root to xfs
and did the glibc upgrade chroot from the old to
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3 tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while trying to upgrade my glibc from 2.3.3-lfs to 2.3.6
(because of x264 using sched_getaffinity() with 2 parms, glibc not
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:31:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3 tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while trying to upgrade my glibc from 2.3.3-lfs to 2.3.6
On 07/01/07 19:40:50, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:31:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo!
I'm trying to compile a gcc-4.0.3 to compile glibc-2.3.6 but gcc-4.0.3
tests
have tls failures, see attachment test_summary01.out.
I ran into problems while
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:05:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry my mail is not clear. I have an LFS 5.1.1 nearly three years old
and pretty big, so I'm not happy with doing a new LFS if I can't use what I
did in BLFS sinc then.
Upgrading is the one thing we probably
chapter 6.11
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-attr3.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-clock2.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/c++-types-check.out]
21 matches
Mail list logo
