Re: quot;autoquot; in /etc/fstab

2010-10-11 Thread rhubarb...@poetworld.net
--- Original Message --- From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com[mailto:rhubarbpie...@gmail.com] Sent: 10/10/2010 11:12:48 AM To : rhubarb...@poetworld.net Cc : Subject : FW: Re: FW: Re: auto in /etc/fstab On 10/10/2010 01:05 PM, rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote: ---

Re: quot;autoquot; in /etc/fstab

2010-10-11 Thread Neal Murphy
On Monday 11 October 2010 07:56:17 rhubarb...@poetworld.net wrote: --- Original Message --- From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com[mailto:rhubarbpie...@gmail.com] Sent: 10/10/2010 11:12:48 AM To : rhubarb...@poetworld.net Cc : Subject : FW: Re: FW: Re: auto in /etc/fstab

Re: quot;autoquot; in /etc/fstab

2010-10-11 Thread rhubarbpie
On 10/11/2010 08:39 AM, Neal Murphy wrote: Binutils are getting better at recognizing a filesystem and loading its module(s) as needed before mounting it; it wasn't always thus. Regardless of that, there are two consumers of /etc/fstab: the computer, and the admin; it needs to be computer