Re: [lfs-support] flex before binutils in lfs 8.0 possible?

Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi all I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled before it. Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would allow me to get the same results later

Re: [lfs-support] flex before binutils in lfs 8.0 possible?

On 03/24/2017 08:56 PM, Glaudiston Gomes da Silva wrote: I think it's necessary only if you run autogen.sh script. If you decompress the tarball and run the "configure" script directly flex is not a prerequisite. 2017-03-24 16:51 GMT-03:00 Michael D. L. : As I read Tim

Re: [lfs-support] flex before binutils in lfs 8.0 possible?

I think it's necessary only if you run autogen.sh script. If you decompress the tarball and run the "configure" script directly flex is not a prerequisite. 2017-03-24 16:51 GMT-03:00 Michael D. L. : > > > > On 03/24/2017 08:02 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> I am

Re: [lfs-support] flex before binutils in lfs 8.0 possible?

On 03/24/2017 08:02 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: Hi all I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled before it. Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would allow me

[lfs-support] flex before binutils in lfs 8.0 possible?

Hi all I am just in the process of building lfs 8.0 and came across the situation that binutils seems to link against flex if available, but is compiled before it. Would there be a problem if I compile flex before binutils? This would allow me to get the same results later if I recompile