[lfs-support] Bash: /usr/{literally everything}: no such file or directory

So I have little doubt that I have somehow managed to completely ruin my LFS build and will likely have to start all over again (for what will be the fourth time). I figured I would throw one last Hail Mary and ask in here for any suggestions, however, before giving up on two/three weeks of hard

Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit

-- Original Message -- From: "geist1...@juno.com" To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 02:32:26 GMT -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Rogers" To:

Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit

-- Original Message -- From: "Paul Rogers" To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:50:24 -0700 > Paul and everyone; > You may be blessed with a memory that would remember these things,

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On 10/13/19 5:08 PM, Richard Melville wrote: On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 19:09, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: On 10/13/19 12:26 PM, Richard Melville wrote: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 17:31, Bruce Dubbs mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com> >

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 19:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 10/13/19 12:26 PM, Richard Melville wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 17:31, Bruce Dubbs > > wrote: > > > > On 10/13/19 10:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:51:58AM -0500, Bruce

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On 10/13/19 12:26 PM, Richard Melville wrote: On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 17:31, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: On 10/13/19 10:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:51:58AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 09:50:19AM +0800,

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On 10/13/19 10:56 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:51:58AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 09:50:19AM +0800, niuneilneo wrote: -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:51:58AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 09:50:19AM +0800, niuneilneo wrote: > > > -- > > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > >

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 08:51:10AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > It's all in the archive, starting at > > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2019-October/053129.htm Ken, you omitted l from html; required in my 6 web browsers. > FWIIW, I've never received the first

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 09:50:19AM +0800, niuneilneo wrote: > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order

Re: [lfs-support] v9.0 Chptr 6.21 GCC configure returns: "Building GCC requires GMP 4.2+, MPFR 2.4.0+ and MPC 0.8.0+"

On 13/10/2019 04:59, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 09:50:19AM +0800, niuneilneo wrote: >>On 10/13/2019 09:31，Bruce Hill wrote： >> >> This 'thread' was so strange. I never saw any message, just the reply to >> messages that went somewhere else first. >> > >> Maybe