Re: [lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:34:39PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > Hi! > > When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) > of > the LFS Book (version 9.1) I realized I had downloaded the patch (fhs) for > glibc and was

Re: [lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

Em qui., 6 de ago. de 2020 às 21:02, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:34:39PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > > Hi! > > > > When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) > > > of > > the LFS Book

[lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

Hi! When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) of the LFS Book (version 9.1) I realized I had downloaded the patch (fhs) for glibc and was unsure whether to use it or not, so I started googling trying to figure out

[lfs-support] suggestion

when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine but because you can get recycled computers from universities I decided to build lfs on one of those instead (I got an optiplex 755 for less than

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Michael Havens wrote: > when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so > that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine > but because you can get recycled computers from universities I

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

Michael Havens wrote: when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine but because you can get recycled computers from universities I decided to build lfs on one of those instead (I got an

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Michael Havens wrote: > >> when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build so >> that is what I do. I was also instructed to build it on a virtual machine >> but because you can get recycled

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > You don't need to copy since you are extracting from the source >>> directory. >>> >>> So then you untar the files in $LFS/sources? > from $LFS/sources : tar -xjf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2 cd gcc-5.2.0 cp

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

tar -xf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2 cd gcc-5.2.0 cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz . cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz . cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz . tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz mv -v gmp-6.0.0 gmp tar -xf ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0.3 mpc --

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

Michael Havens wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: #5.5 tar -xf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2 cd gcc-5.2.0 cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz . cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz . cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz . tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr tar -xJf

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > >> Michael Havens wrote: >> >>> when I first began playing with LFS I was instructed to script my build >>> so >>> that is what I do. I

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Craig Garner wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs >> wrote: >> >>> Michael Havens wrote: >>> when I

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

> > >>> You don't need to copy since you are extracting from the source >> directory. >> >> So then you untar the files in $LFS/sources? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

So please, what about this is wrong: tar -xf gcc-5.2.0.tar.bz2 cd gcc-5.2.0 cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz . cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz . cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz . tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfr tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz mv -v gmp-6.0.0 gmp tar -xf ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz mv -v mpc-1.0.3

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

Michael Havens wrote: No. It is tar -xf ../ so you are in the build dir and extracting from sources. That's the way I got it. Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing. You are not

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

> > Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of > the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing. > You are not doing that yet. Why do you think the cp commands are needed? > They are not in the book. > But the book says to 'Unpack each

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

hahaha... I get it! cp ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz . copy a file in a directory above cp ../mpc-1.0.3.tar.gz . cp ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz . tar -xf ../mpfr-3.1.3.tar.xz mv -v mpfr-3.1.3 mpfrun tar a file in a directory above tar -xf ../gmp-6.0.0a.tar.xz mv -v

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of >> the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing. >> You are not doing that yet. Why do you think the cp commands are

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

-Original Message- From: Tim Tassonis <st...@decentral.ch> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sent: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:51 Subject: Re: [lfs-support] suggestion On 10/25/15 19:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Michael Havens wrote: >>> >>> Yes, but you have th

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

Michael Havens wrote: Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing. You are not doing that yet. Why do you think the cp commands are needed? They are not in the book. But the book says to

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

> > > The ../ tells it to use the package 1 dir up. You are just making extra > copies that don't even get extracted. > > sorry it took so long to understand. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On 10/25/15 19:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Michael Havens wrote: Yes, but you have three meaningless cp commands in your script. Part of the LFS goals is to teach how to visualize what the commands are doing. You are not doing that yet. Why do you think the cp commands are needed? They are not in

Re: [lfs-support] suggestion

On 10/25/15 20:00, James E. Lang wrote: -Original Message- From: Tim Tassonis <st...@decentral.ch <mailto:st...@decentral.ch>> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org <mailto:lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> Sent: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:51 Subject: Re: [lfs-s