Re: How to Improve the LFS book

2010-05-28 Thread Paul Rogers
On this topic, I too had a notion that what I call Lab Notes would have been an improvement and perhaps call users attention to important procedures. I like that. In the BLFS book, each package has user notes that link to a wiki page if it exists. Those are not even noticed unless the

Re: How to Improve the LFS book

2010-05-28 Thread Mike McCarty
Paul Rogers wrote: I do too! Although I strongly suggest that section of the book NOT refer to anything online, but include whatever's important as succinct notes. I strongly recommend all systems be built on disconnected, standalone boxes. I was surprized the book doesn't! I do, too,

How to Improve the LFS book

2010-05-27 Thread JimD.
On this topic, I too had a notion that what I call Lab Notes would have been an improvement and perhaps call users attention to important procedures. I did this for my self, as the text does a good job of explaining the what and the how,but the how is embedded in the text, and not as easily

Re: How to Improve the LFS book

2010-05-27 Thread linux fan
On 5/27/10, JimD. wrote: On this topic, I too had a notion that what I call Lab Notes would have been an improvement and perhaps call users attention to important procedures. I like that. In the BLFS book, each package has user notes that link to a wiki page if it exists. Those are not even