Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
El lun., 26 oct. 2020 a las 14:16, Hideo () escribió: > > El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 20:27, Bruce Dubbs > () escribió: > > > > On 10/23/20 12:51 PM, Hideo wrote: > > > El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 18:58, Bruce Dubbs > > > () escribió: > > >> > > >> On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: > > >>> Dear Team, > > >>> > > >>> I have this error when run a make -k check: > > >>> > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-0. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-1. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-2. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-3. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-4. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-5. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-6. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-7. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-8. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-9. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-10. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-11. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-12. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-13. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-14. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-15. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-16. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-17. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-18. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-19. > > >>> PASS: test-strtol-20. > > >>> make[3]: Leaving directory > > >>> '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' > > >>> make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' > > >>> make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. > > >>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. > > >>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' > > >>> make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 > > >>> make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. > > >> > > >> That does not tell us anything. We need to see what failed in order to > > >> help. Did you log the output of the tests? There should be several > > >> places like: > > >> > > >> Testsuite summary for gold 0.1 > > >> > > >> # TOTAL: 277 > > >> # PASS: 277 > > >> # SKIP: 0 > > >> # XFAIL: 0 > > >> # FAIL: 0 > > >> # XPASS: 0 > > >> # ERROR: 0 > > >> > > >> or > > >> === ld Summary === > > >> > > >> # of expected passes2565 > > >> # of expected failures 57 > > >> # of untested testcases 1 > > >> # of unsupported tests 23 > > >> > > >> or just look for FAIL somewhere for a specific test. > > >> > > >> -- Bruce > > >> -- > > >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > > >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > >> > > >> Do not top post on this list. > > >> > > >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > >> A: Top-posting. > > >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > >> > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Checked logs, and see this messages, on gold folder the result it's OK: > > > > > > === > > > gold 0.1: ./test-suite.log > > > > > > > > > # TOTAL: 4 > > > # PASS: 4 > > > # SKIP: 0 > > > # XFAIL: 0 > > > # FAIL: 0 > > > # XPASS: 0 > > > # ERROR: 0 > > > > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > > > > > but the next one (ld) it shows: > > > > > > > > > === ld Summary === > > > > > > # of expected passes2564 > > > # of unexpected failures1 > > > # of expected failures 57 > > > # of untested testcases 1 > > > # of unsupported tests 23 > > > Executing on host: ./ld-new --version /dev/null ld.version (timeout = > > > 300) > > > spawn [open ...] > > > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 > > > Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of > > > the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later > > > version. > > > This program has absolutely no warranty. > > > ./ld-new 2.35 > > > > > > Searching for error messages on ld.log, saw this error repeated: > > > > > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > In chroot, do you have /dev/null ? From the above that's about the only > > thing I can think of without digging into the test details. The output > > you have is proper for './ld-new --version' > > > >-- Bruce > > > > > > > > -- > > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > > Do not top post on this list. > > > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > A: Top-posting. > > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > > Hello, > > I've /dev/null on chroot: > > (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/ld# ls -l /dev/null > crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 3 Oct 21 11:14 /dev/null > (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/ld# > > (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/build# ./ld/ld-new --version > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 > Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This program is free software; you may redistribute it
Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 20:27, Bruce Dubbs () escribió: > > On 10/23/20 12:51 PM, Hideo wrote: > > El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 18:58, Bruce Dubbs > > () escribió: > >> > >> On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: > >>> Dear Team, > >>> > >>> I have this error when run a make -k check: > >>> > >>> PASS: test-strtol-0. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-1. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-2. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-3. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-4. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-5. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-6. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-7. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-8. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-9. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-10. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-11. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-12. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-13. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-14. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-15. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-16. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-17. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-18. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-19. > >>> PASS: test-strtol-20. > >>> make[3]: Leaving directory > >>> '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' > >>> make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' > >>> make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. > >>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. > >>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' > >>> make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 > >>> make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. > >> > >> That does not tell us anything. We need to see what failed in order to > >> help. Did you log the output of the tests? There should be several > >> places like: > >> > >> Testsuite summary for gold 0.1 > >> > >> # TOTAL: 277 > >> # PASS: 277 > >> # SKIP: 0 > >> # XFAIL: 0 > >> # FAIL: 0 > >> # XPASS: 0 > >> # ERROR: 0 > >> > >> or > >> === ld Summary === > >> > >> # of expected passes2565 > >> # of expected failures 57 > >> # of untested testcases 1 > >> # of unsupported tests 23 > >> > >> or just look for FAIL somewhere for a specific test. > >> > >> -- Bruce > >> -- > >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page > >> > >> Do not top post on this list. > >> > >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > >> A: Top-posting. > >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > > > > > > Hello, > > > > Checked logs, and see this messages, on gold folder the result it's OK: > > > > === > > gold 0.1: ./test-suite.log > > > > > > # TOTAL: 4 > > # PASS: 4 > > # SKIP: 0 > > # XFAIL: 0 > > # FAIL: 0 > > # XPASS: 0 > > # ERROR: 0 > > > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > > > but the next one (ld) it shows: > > > > > > === ld Summary === > > > > # of expected passes2564 > > # of unexpected failures1 > > # of expected failures 57 > > # of untested testcases 1 > > # of unsupported tests 23 > > Executing on host: ./ld-new --version /dev/null ld.version (timeout = 300) > > spawn [open ...] > > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 > > Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of > > the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later > > version. > > This program has absolutely no warranty. > > ./ld-new 2.35 > > > > Searching for error messages on ld.log, saw this error repeated: > > > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > In chroot, do you have /dev/null ? From the above that's about the only > thing I can think of without digging into the test details. The output > you have is proper for './ld-new --version' > >-- Bruce > > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Hello, I've /dev/null on chroot: (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/ld# ls -l /dev/null crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 1, 3 Oct 21 11:14 /dev/null (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/ld# (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/build# ./ld/ld-new --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. (lfs chroot) root:/sources/binutils-2.35/build# -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A:
Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
On 10/23/20 12:51 PM, Hideo wrote: El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 18:58, Bruce Dubbs () escribió: On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: Dear Team, I have this error when run a make -k check: PASS: test-strtol-0. PASS: test-strtol-1. PASS: test-strtol-2. PASS: test-strtol-3. PASS: test-strtol-4. PASS: test-strtol-5. PASS: test-strtol-6. PASS: test-strtol-7. PASS: test-strtol-8. PASS: test-strtol-9. PASS: test-strtol-10. PASS: test-strtol-11. PASS: test-strtol-12. PASS: test-strtol-13. PASS: test-strtol-14. PASS: test-strtol-15. PASS: test-strtol-16. PASS: test-strtol-17. PASS: test-strtol-18. PASS: test-strtol-19. PASS: test-strtol-20. make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. That does not tell us anything. We need to see what failed in order to help. Did you log the output of the tests? There should be several places like: Testsuite summary for gold 0.1 # TOTAL: 277 # PASS: 277 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 or === ld Summary === # of expected passes2565 # of expected failures 57 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 23 or just look for FAIL somewhere for a specific test. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Hello, Checked logs, and see this messages, on gold folder the result it's OK: === gold 0.1: ./test-suite.log # TOTAL: 4 # PASS: 4 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 but the next one (ld) it shows: === ld Summary === # of expected passes2564 # of unexpected failures1 # of expected failures 57 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 23 Executing on host: ./ld-new --version /dev/null ld.version (timeout = 300) spawn [open ...] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. ./ld-new 2.35 Searching for error messages on ld.log, saw this error repeated: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status In chroot, do you have /dev/null ? From the above that's about the only thing I can think of without digging into the test details. The output you have is proper for './ld-new --version' -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
El vie., 23 oct. 2020 a las 18:58, Bruce Dubbs () escribió: > > On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: > > Dear Team, > > > > I have this error when run a make -k check: > > > > PASS: test-strtol-0. > > PASS: test-strtol-1. > > PASS: test-strtol-2. > > PASS: test-strtol-3. > > PASS: test-strtol-4. > > PASS: test-strtol-5. > > PASS: test-strtol-6. > > PASS: test-strtol-7. > > PASS: test-strtol-8. > > PASS: test-strtol-9. > > PASS: test-strtol-10. > > PASS: test-strtol-11. > > PASS: test-strtol-12. > > PASS: test-strtol-13. > > PASS: test-strtol-14. > > PASS: test-strtol-15. > > PASS: test-strtol-16. > > PASS: test-strtol-17. > > PASS: test-strtol-18. > > PASS: test-strtol-19. > > PASS: test-strtol-20. > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' > > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' > > make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. > > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' > > make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 > > make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. > > That does not tell us anything. We need to see what failed in order to > help. Did you log the output of the tests? There should be several > places like: > > Testsuite summary for gold 0.1 > > # TOTAL: 277 > # PASS: 277 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 0 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > or > === ld Summary === > > # of expected passes2565 > # of expected failures 57 > # of untested testcases 1 > # of unsupported tests 23 > > or just look for FAIL somewhere for a specific test. > >-- Bruce > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Hello, Checked logs, and see this messages, on gold folder the result it's OK: === gold 0.1: ./test-suite.log # TOTAL: 4 # PASS: 4 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2 but the next one (ld) it shows: === ld Summary === # of expected passes2564 # of unexpected failures1 # of expected failures 57 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 23 Executing on host: ./ld-new --version /dev/null ld.version (timeout = 300) spawn [open ...] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.35 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. ./ld-new 2.35 Searching for error messages on ld.log, saw this error repeated: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
On 10/23/20 11:28 AM, Hideo wrote: Dear Team, I have this error when run a make -k check: PASS: test-strtol-0. PASS: test-strtol-1. PASS: test-strtol-2. PASS: test-strtol-3. PASS: test-strtol-4. PASS: test-strtol-5. PASS: test-strtol-6. PASS: test-strtol-7. PASS: test-strtol-8. PASS: test-strtol-9. PASS: test-strtol-10. PASS: test-strtol-11. PASS: test-strtol-12. PASS: test-strtol-13. PASS: test-strtol-14. PASS: test-strtol-15. PASS: test-strtol-16. PASS: test-strtol-17. PASS: test-strtol-18. PASS: test-strtol-19. PASS: test-strtol-20. make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. That does not tell us anything. We need to see what failed in order to help. Did you log the output of the tests? There should be several places like: Testsuite summary for gold 0.1 # TOTAL: 277 # PASS: 277 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 or === ld Summary === # of expected passes2565 # of expected failures 57 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 23 or just look for FAIL somewhere for a specific test. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
[lfs-support] Make -k test failed - on 8.18. Binutils-2.35
Dear Team, I have this error when run a make -k check: PASS: test-strtol-0. PASS: test-strtol-1. PASS: test-strtol-2. PASS: test-strtol-3. PASS: test-strtol-4. PASS: test-strtol-5. PASS: test-strtol-6. PASS: test-strtol-7. PASS: test-strtol-8. PASS: test-strtol-9. PASS: test-strtol-10. PASS: test-strtol-11. PASS: test-strtol-12. PASS: test-strtol-13. PASS: test-strtol-14. PASS: test-strtol-15. PASS: test-strtol-16. PASS: test-strtol-17. PASS: test-strtol-18. PASS: test-strtol-19. PASS: test-strtol-20. make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build/libiberty' make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-2.35/build' make: *** [Makefile:2238: do-check] Error 2 make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. - David -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
