On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 09:51:57PM +0200, Nicolas Noble wrote:
> > Alright. I'll revisit this once the current queue stuff is settled and tested.
>
> If you need some dummy code like this, I can handle this. Well, I've
> already started a String class for myself. So if you want it, just yell,
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:25:31PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> > A simple string class can be useful. But passing it by value can be costly.
> > I think much of c++ bloat goes from that.
>
> Well, most of the time it's passed by reference (const string &); more often, the
> cost is te
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 04:25:31PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> A simple string class can be useful. But passing it by value can be costly.
> I think much of c++ bloat goes from that.
Well, most of the time it's passed by reference (const string &); more often, the
cost is temporaries du
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:30:00PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
> > Why not introduce some sort of string class into lftp? It's understandable
> A simple string class can be useful. But passing it by value can be costly.
> I think much of c+
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 03:42:29PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
> Anyhow, this isn't really an issue worth another day of deliberation. :)
> Here's a better idea: change is_queue to has_queue, of type QueueFeeder.
> If there's a queue, it points to it; if not, it's NULL. No extra code,
> no ass
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:30:00PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
> Why not introduce some sort of string class into lftp? It's understandable
> to avoid system STL and C++ strings (they're taking absurdly long to actually
> become implemented well outside of g++), but it'd probably be worthwhile
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:12:27PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:29:48PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
+0400. -0400. Exact opposite timezones ... which explains why you're
always replying right as I'm going to bed. :)
> > Try this: create a file, containing a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:29:48PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
> Try this: create a file, containing a simple command (ie. just an echo); and
> issue "repeat 0 que source filename". It'll leak like crazy.
I think it queues commands faster than executes them. So it is not a leak.
--
Alexan
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 05:39:35PM -0400, Glenn F. Maynard wrote:
> glenn 8389 0.0 51.2 84056 6 pts/30 SJul16 3:40 lftp
>
> That's from:
> repeat "find ; cache f"
> repeated a few hundred times. This is Debian/unstable's 2.3.11, not CVS. It
> appears to be trivially reproducable,
