Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 09:47:31PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Yep. (Otherwise it would fall back on English.) There's something in > > addition to being in that locale that's triggering this, I think, or > > perhaps a difference in our PL locales. I'm testing directly out of > > CVS

Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yep. (Otherwise it would fall back on English.) There's something in > addition to being in that locale that's triggering this, I think, or > perhaps a difference in our PL locales. I'm testing directly out of > CVS, without the NUMERIC hack. I'm usi

Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:26:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > Do you have locale files for pl/iso8859-2 generated? Yep. (Otherwise it would fall back on English.) There's something in addition to being in that locale that's triggering this, I think, or perhaps a difference in our PL l

Re: get/mget, etc

2001-11-19 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 05:25:26AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:39:05PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > > It is low priority to me. Do you want get to expand wildcards or you > > just do not like the presence of extra commands? > > I don't like having to distingu

Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Maybe this patch will fix that. Does anybody has any better solution? It helps. > > setlocale (LC_ALL, ""); > > + setlocale (LC_NUMERIC, "C"); > I can't reproduce this with LC_ALL=pl_PL.ISO-8859-2; what's needed? But I can :-) Session with lo

Re: get/mget, etc

2001-11-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:39:05PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > It is low priority to me. Do you want get to expand wildcards or you > just do not like the presence of extra commands? I don't like having to distinguish; it seems like an unnecessary distinction, especially considering tha

Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:17:14PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 05:33:22PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > I'm using lftp 2.4.7 and: > > > > lftp ftp.netscape.com:/pub/netscape6/english/6.2/unix/linux22/plugins> get >jre131i.xpi > > `jre131i.xpi' w 0 [Cze

Re: get/mget, etc

2001-11-19 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:38:51PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > Is there anything fundamentally preventing merging get with mget, and > put with mput? It is low priority to me. Do you want get to expand wildcards or you just do not like the presence of extra commands? > There are two traditiona

Re: broken 2.4.7 release?

2001-11-19 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 05:33:22PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > I'm using lftp 2.4.7 and: > > lftp ftp.netscape.com:/pub/netscape6/english/6.2/unix/linux22/plugins> get >jre131i.xpi > `jre131i.xpi' w 0 [Czekanie na odpowied?...] > > It's waiting for answer all the time but (well it onl

Re: get/mget, etc

2001-11-19 Thread Piotr Krukowiecki
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Piotr Krukowiecki wrote: > Can i ask for adding mpget (or pmget?) - like pget but working with > metachars (ie. pmget -n 2 *.avi). I noticed that it's in TODO list. Sorry for not checking it fully. I didn't find this in TODO: mirror -n 2 -P This would download one file in