Re: A bug in lftp 2.5.1

2002-05-19 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:32:02PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: Thanks! I have applied the patch. I wonder, how this condition can be true? Is it related to dns server reply forgery? Did you apply this to lftp-2-4? Now I did. Thanks for reminder! I've pulled this patch out

Re: A bug in lftp 2.5.1

2002-05-13 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:39:44PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:46:48PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: Thanks! I have applied the patch. I wonder, how this condition can be true? Is it related to dns server reply forgery? Did you apply this to lftp-2-4? Now

Re: A bug in lftp 2.5.1

2002-05-13 Thread Solar Designer
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:46:48PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 02:19:00AM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: Alexander, -- I don't remember whether we have submitted other fixes we have in the lftp package on Owl. I've attached the important security fix now,