On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 06:09:23PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
repeat 0s foo often requires multiple ^Cs to stop. It seems that
the CmdExec within SleepJob is being run by the scheduler first, not
doing anything with the SIGINT (since it's not interactive), and then
clearing it in
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:01:33AM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
I think you are right. Here is another patch.
This fixes the repeat 0 foo problem, but repeat 0 !echo hi still has
problems. I'm not sure why. I'll try to track it down. (I'm not sure
where the signal's going.)
--
Glenn
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 04:18:06AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 11:01:33AM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
I think you are right. Here is another patch.
This fixes the repeat 0 foo problem, but repeat 0 !echo hi still has
problems. I'm not sure why. I'll try to
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 12:00:09AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
You left out the rest of the stuff in that file, too ...
What did I forget?
The repeat problem isn't completely contrived, by the way; it also happens
when any filters are used (ie. repeat 0s zcat file).
There is a way to solve
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:07:58PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Try:
repeat 0s !echo hi
A ^C gets eaten by the child job; you have to mash ^C to stop it. I'm
not sure there's a clean way to fix this. (Repeat shouldn't stop if its
command exits with an error; perhaps it should exit if the
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:09:41PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
Try:
repeat 0s !echo hi
A ^C gets eaten by the child job; you have to mash ^C to stop it. I'm
not sure there's a clean way to fix this. (Repeat shouldn't stop if its
command exits with an error; perhaps it should
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:07:58PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:15:02PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
I have committed it to cvs, without commented out test code.
Normally I'd bash on this a bit more before sending it in, but since the
stuff in CVS right now
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:10:43PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
Patches applied. I left out debug resource for now, maybe will add it later,
along with other debug settings.
You left out the rest of the stuff in that file, too ...
The repeat problem isn't completely contrived, by the
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:00:42PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 01:58:53PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
OutputJob. It's useful, fixes the cls bug, and makes buffered outputting
trivial from any job, but it's still a bit overcomplicated and I havn't
had the
