Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc 3.0 snapshots

2001-03-13 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:38:22AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > checking how to link simple c++ programs... using gcc > while AC_TRY_COMPILE fails. It does not fail, I should have used AC_TRY_LINK :) -- Alexander.

Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc 3.0 snapshots

2001-03-13 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On/Dnia Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:54:05AM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote/napisał(a) > > Also I have another problem. gcc 3.0 snap comes with libsupc++.a which contains > > new and delete operators: > > > > ResMgr.o(.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)' > > ResMgr.o(.text+

Re: glibc 2.2 and gcc 3.0 snapshots

2001-03-13 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 08:16:46PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > Simplest patch without superfluous __GNUC_PREREQ checking: Applied, thanks. > Also I have another problem. gcc 3.0 snap comes with libsupc++.a which contains > new and delete operators: > > ResMgr.o(.text+0x33f): undefined r