Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:21:03PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > It was a little more direct, originally, storing the interval with its > constructor; I removed that as the interval can change with each call. > I might put it back and update the interval with Reconfig, which would > make it more s

Re: SFTP protocol support wanted to LFTP

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:44:23AM +, Jonas Larsson wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > Thanks for a really nice application (LFTP) :) > > The most secure ftpd around (as I think) is pure-ftpd (http://pureftpd.org/) > > and it has right now added support for the SFTP protocol. Unfortunately only

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
(responding to both) On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:09:46PM +0400, Alexey Khlyamkov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:03:17PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > > Even if it were represented in such a way, nobody would like > > 1970-01-01 00:00:01 for one-second time interval. > One-second interv

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Alexey Khlyamkov
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:03:17PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > Even if it were represented in such a way, nobody would like > 1970-01-01 00:00:01 for one-second time interval. One-second interval must be written as -00-00 00:00:01 (this is better human readable form for time interva

SFTP protocol support wanted to LFTP

2001-10-09 Thread Jonas Larsson
Hello Alexander, Thanks for a really nice application (LFTP) :) The most secure ftpd around (as I think) is pure-ftpd (http://pureftpd.org/) and it has right now added support for the SFTP protocol. Unfortunately only (as I know) openssh supports that protocol under UNIX. :( If you could take

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:30:54PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:07:45PM +0400, Alexey Khlyamkov wrote: > > I decided to agree with Glenn at the first time. But after some > > thinking became to the following. Time and time difference have the > > same meaning in phisica

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:07:45PM +0400, Alexey Khlyamkov wrote: > I decided to agree with Glenn at the first time. But after some > thinking became to the following. Time and time difference have the > same meaning in phisical terms. But lftp use term "time" as calendar > term but not phisical o

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 02:24:49PM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > > I don't see where the problem is, this is a pretty standard operation (and a > > fairly textbook class.) It's the same as BSD timeradd/timersub, just with C++ > > syntax. > > I have applied the patch, although I don't part

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Alexey Khlyamkov
> > > Time difference is not quite the same as time. Another class? Is it worth > > > the trouble? Time difference in milliseconds is enough for lftp, I think. > > > > Er? Time stores either a time or an amount of time, just like time_t > > and timeval do. A difference of two times is an amount

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Alexander V. Lukyanov
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:43:16AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:50:56AM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > > Time difference is not quite the same as time. Another class? Is it worth > > the trouble? Time difference in milliseconds is enough for lftp, I think. > > Er

Re: minor stuff

2001-10-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:50:56AM +0400, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote: > Time difference is not quite the same as time. Another class? Is it worth > the trouble? Time difference in milliseconds is enough for lftp, I think. Er? Time stores either a time or an amount of time, just like time_t and