readline-4.2/config.h.in missing.
--
Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:37:05PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> Maybe. But I would prefer status line updates to be atomic, so that
> other tty output would not break it in half. No big difference, actually.
Hmm, that's true.
> BTW, other tty output in lftp is blocking also. I remember
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:55:29PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> >
> > I'm still confused as to the point of a "difference of time" class; what
> > is gained? Time is an amount of time (and acts as time of day using the
> > standard epoch paradigm, storing time in terms of "amount of tim
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:15:34PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 04:41:34PM +0300, Alexander V. Lukyanov wrote:
> > Good thing to have, but it is quite boring to create.
>
> And difficult to be sure it's comprehensive.
>
> +TimeDiff status_interval(0,ResMgr::Query
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:34:06PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> StatusLine is blocking; this causes all transfers to stop if its
> printf()s block. It should probably go through some buffering layer.
Maybe. But I would prefer status line updates to be atomic, so that
other tty output would not
