On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Vittorio Giovara
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:45 PM, James Almer wrote:
>>> Calling put_ebml_binary() with sizeof(private) as
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Vittorio Giovara
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:45 PM, James Almer wrote:
>> Calling put_ebml_binary() with sizeof(private) as argument is currently
>> only valid for Equirectangular projections.
>>
>>
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:45 PM, James Almer wrote:
> Calling put_ebml_binary() with sizeof(private) as argument is currently
> only valid for Equirectangular projections.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Please, be more careful when making cosmetic
On 06/04/2017 22:45, James Almer wrote:
> Calling put_ebml_binary() with sizeof(private) as argument is currently
> only valid for Equirectangular projections.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> ---
> Please, be more careful when making cosmetic changes to make sure they
> don't
Calling put_ebml_binary() with sizeof(private) as argument is currently
only valid for Equirectangular projections.
Signed-off-by: James Almer
---
Please, be more careful when making cosmetic changes to make sure they
don't also change how the code works.
Not only this was