Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 1/1] dcadsp: add int8x8_fmul_int32 to dsp context

2014-02-07 Thread Christophe Gisquet
Hi, 2014-02-06 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org: I though more of something like below which is smaller and has imho clearer preprocessor use. Janne av_unused might be added. That way it should not make a difference between Christophe macro and this speedwise. Following your suggestion,

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 1/1] dcadsp: add int8x8_fmul_int32 to dsp context

2014-02-07 Thread Janne Grunau
On 2014-02-07 21:51:02 +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote: From c233b96fa29150b0385776499e90afc9b59405b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:17:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] dcadsp: add int8x8_fmul_int32 to DSP context It

[libav-devel] [PATCH 1/1] dcadsp: add int8x8_fmul_int32 to dsp context

2014-02-06 Thread Janne Grunau
From: Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com On 2014-02-06 00:40:50 +, Christophe Gisquet wrote: It is currently declared as a macro who is set to inlinable functions, among which a Neon implementation. Add a DSP parameter to the macro, so that the implementation can either be

Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 1/1] dcadsp: add int8x8_fmul_int32 to dsp context

2014-02-06 Thread Luca Barbato
On 06/02/14 12:30, Janne Grunau wrote: From: Christophe Gisquet christophe.gisq...@gmail.com On 2014-02-06 00:40:50 +, Christophe Gisquet wrote: It is currently declared as a macro who is set to inlinable functions, among which a Neon implementation. Add a DSP parameter to the macro,