On Thu, 21 May 2015, wm4 wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015 16:08:59 +0300
Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
This avoids hijacking the fd, by reading using the normal
URLContext functions instead. This allowing reading data that has
been buffered in the underlying URLContext.
This avoids using
This avoids hijacking the fd, by reading using the normal
URLContext functions instead. This allowing reading data that has
been buffered in the underlying URLContext.
This avoids using the libraries own send functions that can
cause SIGPIPE.
The fd is still needed for polling the lowlevel
On Thu, 21 May 2015 16:08:59 +0300
Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
This avoids hijacking the fd, by reading using the normal
URLContext functions instead. This allowing reading data that has
been buffered in the underlying URLContext.
This avoids using the libraries own send
On Thu, 21 May 2015 22:07:39 +0300 (EEST)
Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015, wm4 wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015 16:08:59 +0300
Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
This avoids hijacking the fd, by reading using the
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015, wm4 wrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2015 16:08:59 +0300
Martin Storsjö mar...@martin.st wrote:
This avoids hijacking the fd, by reading using the normal
URLContext functions instead. This allowing reading data that has
been buffered in
