On 25/12/2016 20:24, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> When allocating stack space with an alignment requirement that is
> larger than the current stack alignment we need to store a copy of
> the original stack pointer in order to be able to restore it later.
>
> If we chose to use another register for
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> I know I'm terribly nitpicking here for the limited scope of the comment,
> but this only matters for functions that have a return value. Do you think
> it makes sense to allow functions to opt out of this requirement
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Henrik Gramner wrote:
> When allocating stack space with an alignment requirement that is larger
> than the current stack alignment we need to store a copy of the original
> stack pointer in order to be able to restore it later.
>
> If we