Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-06-07 Thread Diego Biurrun
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Starting with 0.6.2, these releases are accompanied by binary archives > for the win32 platform. Do we want and have the ressources to a) > continue this and b) extend this to include .deb and .rpm packages? Providing .deb pack

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-16 Thread Luca Barbato
On 04/16/2011 10:57 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > while still travelling but having lurked from time to time on IRC, I > note that some downstreams express some interest in libav 'snapshots'. > In this context, I'd like to introduce and clarify a nomenclature which > I think matches the wo

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:57:14 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote: [...] > > Starting with 0.6.2, these releases are accompanied by binary archives > for the win32 platform. Do we want and have the ressources to a) > continue this and b) extend this to include .deb and .rpm packages? > [...] > >

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, while still travelling but having lurked from time to time on IRC, I note that some downstreams express some interest in libav 'snapshots'. In this context, I'd like to introduce and clarify a nomenclature which I think matches the workflow that Libav uses. Releases: The Libav projects bless

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-05 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:31:39PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now with FATE being very green these days, we should look more closely > > into doing another release soon. Currently, I see the following release > >

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-05 Thread Anton Khirnov
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > Now with FATE being very green these days, we should look more closely > into doing another release soon. Currently, I see the following release > goals: > > The Big Bump > > > This is currently blocked by t

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-03 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > h264-mt > --- > It would be really sad to miss this. Ronald, can you please give an > update how much work is left to finish this? There's 1) FATE failures in MBAFF files, 2) timestamp messups, 3) error resilience works different

Re: [libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-03 Thread Luca Barbato
On 04/03/2011 08:05 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Hi, > > Now with FATE being very green these days, we should look more closely > into doing another release soon. Currently, I see the following release > goals: > > The Big Bump > > > This is currently blocked by the pending API cle

[libav-devel] Towards a 0.7 Release

2011-04-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, Now with FATE being very green these days, we should look more closely into doing another release soon. Currently, I see the following release goals: The Big Bump This is currently blocked by the pending API cleanup. I understand from Anton that this is still ongoing work that w