On 10/11/2017 19:54, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 07:47:44PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 03/11/2017 17:43, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
I'm assuming that the change for MIPS is safe.
From what I recall of the many many ABIs of MIPS it should not.
Can you elaborate, I'm not
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 07:47:44PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 03/11/2017 17:43, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > ---
> >
> > I'm assuming that the change for MIPS is safe.
>
> From what I recall of the many many ABIs of MIPS it should not.
Can you elaborate, I'm not following ..
Diego
On 03/11/2017 17:43, Diego Biurrun wrote:
---
I'm assuming that the change for MIPS is safe.
From what I recall of the many many ABIs of MIPS it should not.
lu
___
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
On 11/3/2017 1:43 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> ---
>
> I'm assuming that the change for MIPS is safe.
If you can't test it on a MIPS target, then it would be best to ask
someone who can.
It probably has its own special check for a reason.
>
> configure | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 7
