On 12/22/2010 08:39 PM, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> Rules can be written using wildcards, but destinations had to be static.
> This patch adds support for following strings in destination:
>
> %u - uid
> %U - username, uid in case of error
> %g - gid
> %G - group name, gid in case of e
Rules can be written using wildcards, but destinations had to be static.
This patch adds support for following strings in destination:
%u - uid
%U - username, uid in case of error
%g - gid
%G - group name, gid in case of error
%p - pid
%P - proccess name, pid in case of error
Mo
Jan Safranek - 13:40 20.12.10 wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 08:18 PM, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> > Rules can be written using wildcards, but destinations had to be static.
> > This patch adds support for following strings in destination:
> >
> > %u - uid
> > %U - username, uid in case of error
> >
On 12/15/2010 08:18 PM, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> Rules can be written using wildcards, but destinations had to be static.
> This patch adds support for following strings in destination:
>
> %u - uid
> %U - username, uid in case of error
> %g - gid
> %G - group name, gid in case of e
Rules can be written using wildcards, but destinations had to be static.
This patch adds support for following strings in destination:
%u - uid
%U - username, uid in case of error
%g - gid
%G - group name, gid in case of error
%p - pid
%P - proccess name, pid in case of error
Mo