Re: [Libcg-devel] [PATCH v2] cgconfigparser: Change permissions if tasks or admin gid is different from uid

2011-05-16 Thread Michal Hocko
The patch has been waiting in for the administrator approval for some days so I have subscribed. Here is the reposted patch. On Fri 13-05-11 14:57:21, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 13-05-11 10:52:50, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi, > > I consider the patch below to be a bug fix (or better said usabilit

[Libcg-devel] [PATCH v2] cgconfigparser: Change permissions if tasks or admin gid is different from uid

2011-05-16 Thread Michal Hocko
On Fri 13-05-11 10:52:50, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > I consider the patch below to be a bug fix (or better said usability > fix). As the changelog says, the proper fix would be to allow > permissions setting in the per configuration section (I have half baked > patch already but I need to clean it

[Libcg-devel] [PATCH] cgconfigparser: Change permissions if tasks or admin gid is different from uid

2011-05-16 Thread Michal Hocko
Hi, I consider the patch below to be a bug fix (or better said usability fix). As the changelog says, the proper fix would be to allow permissions setting in the per configuration section (I have half baked patch already but I need to clean it up). I still think that this should be pushed to the st

Re: [Libcg-devel] libcg manpages revisited

2011-05-16 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Balbir Singh (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) [20110515 07:20]: > Any chance you can rebase them, if not, I'll give it a shot. Sure, here you are. Philipp -- Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every

Re: [Libcg-devel] libcg manpages revisited

2011-05-16 Thread Philipp Thomas
* Balbir Singh (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) [20110513 12:49]: > Are these patches against the latest git tree? No, they are against 0.37.1. Sorry that I forgot to mention that. Philipp -- Achieve unprecedented app perfor

Re: [Libcg-devel] [PATCH v2] cgconfigparser: Change permissions if tasks or admin gid is different from uid

2011-05-16 Thread Balbir Singh
* Michal Hocko [2011-05-16 14:07:05]: > The patch has been waiting in for the administrator approval for some > days so I have subscribed. Here is the reposted patch. > > On Fri 13-05-11 14:57:21, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 13-05-11 10:52:50, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I consider th

Re: [Libcg-devel] [PATCH 01/13] Removed cgroup_dbg from cgrulesengd

2011-05-16 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 05/12/2011 08:57 AM, Jan Safranek wrote: > cgrulesengd has its own logging functions, there is no reason to use > cgroup_dbg. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Safranek > --- > > src/daemon/cgrulesengd.c | 53 > +- > 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 de