Ah! Well, I stuck my foot right in my mouth, didn't I? I did not
read the patch closely enough, please ignore the noise.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Monday 2014-01-06 15:57, Mike Rylander wrote:
>
>>While I can certainly understand the desire to improve handling
On Monday 2014-01-06 15:57, Mike Rylander wrote:
>While I can certainly understand the desire to improve handling of
>dates and times in libdbi (I helped a bit with the timezone code a few
>years back), I think breaking the API for all current applications is
>a bit heavy handed.
Thanks for your
While I can certainly understand the desire to improve handling of
dates and times in libdbi (I helped a bit with the timezone code a few
years back), I think breaking the API for all current applications is
a bit heavy handed. How about a parallel API for grabbing the struct
instead? That way yo
I have a 2-patch here which I would like to share before merging.
SQL databases such as Mysql support dates from 1000-01-01 to
-01-01. However, even "reasonable" dates like 1968-02-14 cannot
be reliably retrieved through libdbi. The root problem is that time_t
only starts at 1970, and MSVCRT
4 matches
Mail list logo
