Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-25 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 24.02.2013 01:43, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: In any case I concluded that firebird is above my head. I've spent an entire week trying to get a simple test case running, to no avail. I'm going to release libdbi-drivers without official firebird support unless someone steps up and

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-19 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 19.02.2013 00:16, schrieb markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de: Did you ever succeed in running the new test kit? Or the old one shipped with 0.8.3 fwiw? hi, i can't remeber on old kit passes and the new one has never pass. christoph

Re: [libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-18 Thread Christoph Kottke
Am 18.02.2013 10:43, schrieb Christoph Kottke: Am 18.02.2013 10:27, schrieb Markus Hoenicka: Classic does not require this step, but it doesn't work either. I'm sure that I miss some critical step in the procedure. What about accounts: do you run your queries from a regular user account? root

[libdbi-users] firebird driver segfault

2013-02-14 Thread Christoph Kottke
hi, i've installed the latest cvs revisions for libdbi and libdbi-driver and when ever i try to fetch more than 3 row from an firebird table it's end in an segfault. but when i revert the bull patch in dbi_result.c it works like a charm. christoph