Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > While we're at it: how do other developers and users feel about
> > moving libdbi
> > development to subversion? Is it worth the hassle?
>
>
> Assuming I'm included in "other": My vote is yes, I'd feel more
> comfortable with Svn.
>
As you brou
On 12-Feb-07, at 3:38 AM, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
>> I wish Sourceforge would deprecate tarballs entirely and just use Svn
>> tags. It seems (from another project I'm on, at least) that the
>> tarball is always woefully out of date.
>>
>> My adv
Claudiu Cismaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> Why don't you release SVN tags and make tarballs, also?
This is actually what I meant. I'm sorry if my message was a bit unclear.
regards,
Markus
--
Markus Hoenicka
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mho
> I'm afraid that "releasing" SVN tags instead of tarballs will deter
> end-users who just need to satisfy some application dependency. A
> tarball is something familiar to non-technical Unix/Linux users,
> whereas subversion is not. Package maintainers are also used to build
> from tarball release
Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I wish Sourceforge would deprecate tarballs entirely and just use Svn
> tags. It seems (from another project I'm on, at least) that the
> tarball is always woefully out of date.
>
> My advice - go ahead and make a new release.
>
Well, we'd have t
On 11-Feb-07, at 9:08 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
> Continuing this long-dormant thread, I want to thank the libdbi core
> team for the help and support in getting basic ISO timezone support
> into the code base. It has helped the Evergreen[1] project immensely,
> as we wouldn't have a fast and sta
