o assume
UTC. It is untested with other databases, but it's fairly protective,
looking for specific timezone markers, and should be able to handle
any standard ISO timezone offset.
Thanks again, in advance.
--
Mike Rylander
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http:
On 5/15/06, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Rylander writes:
> [UPDATE]While my coworker was investigating the problem
> described above further, I've developed (and attached) a patch to
> dbd_helper.c to parse ISO8601 timezone offsets inside
&
On 5/16/06, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Rylander writes:
> I'd be interested to see what the optimization was. :)
>
I've replaced
if (strlen(*cur)) {
with
if (*cur) {
Cool. Not sure why I didn't do that originally... :)
Saves us
On 5/16/06, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Rylander writes:
> I've attached a patch against my local copy of the new file, so it
> should patch CVS with out too much of a fight. I've added a little
> logic to look for a ':' minute
t certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
___
libdbi-users mailing list
libdbi-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourcef
rtable*
> usage pattern for incrementing INSERT ids, but each database tends to
> have a successful workaround.
>
> --Toby
>
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Markus
> > >
> > > --
> > > Markus Hoenicka
> > > [EMAIL PROTE
tch that
comments out that one line, and does nothing else. It's probably just
as easy for someone to go in and remove all the fprintf lines,
commented out or not, since they're not needed at all, AFAICS. Thanks
again!
--
Mike Rylander
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPLS -- PINES Development
Databas
On 2/12/07, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
> > Continuing this long-dormant thread, I want to thank the libdbi core
> > team for the help and support in getting basic ISO timezone support
> > in
On 2/14/07, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>
>
> > hmmm... The libtool interface version number is about compatibility,
> > where as the release number is about human-understandable "freshnes
e your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> libdbi-users mailing list
> libdbi-users@lists.sourcef
27;t heard much of the requested escape-only vs. escape-and
> quote functions? If no one complains, I'll implement these as a
> libdbi-only patch which will leave both libdbi and libdbi-drivers at
> 0.8.3.
>
As long as the existing quote API is unchanged, I think the addition
wou
can't offer many properly shaped tuits toward the development effort
right now, but supporting savepoints should amount to essentially
adding cut-and-paste duplicates of begin, commit and rollback. Would
it be objectionable to ask for savepoint support to piggy-back on
transaction suppo
Hoenicka
> http://www.mhoenicka.de
> AQ score 38
>
>
>
>
> --
> Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
> and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012)
13 matches
Mail list logo
