Toby Thain was heard to say:
> I think the deprecation is progressive because all in all it is
> better if users always specify their instance explicitly. Hidden
> global data has proven to be a liability in many such instances
> (strtok(), errno, ...)
This is certainly the rationale behind the
On 22-Jan-10, at 9:19 PM, Vikram Noel Ambrose wrote:
> Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>> The older versions (dbi_initialize, dbi_conn_new and dbi_shutdown)
>> are
>> now implemented on top of these functions, using a single static
>> instance
>> handle.
>>
>
> Then why should those functions be depre
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> The older versions (dbi_initialize, dbi_conn_new and dbi_shutdown) are
> now implemented on top of these functions, using a single static instance
> handle.
>
Then why should those functions be deprecated? I'm sure the majority of
users do not have such peculiar requir
Vikram Noel Ambrose writes:
> I just built libdbi and libdbi-drivers from svn. When recompiling my
> application, I got a warning saying, dbi_initialize, dbi_conn_new and
> dbi_shutdown has been deprecated.
>
> I think the docs online are out of data:
> http://libdbi.sourceforge.net/docs/p
I just built libdbi and libdbi-drivers from svn. When recompiling my
application, I got a warning saying, dbi_initialize, dbi_conn_new and
dbi_shutdown has been deprecated.
I think the docs online are out of data:
http://libdbi.sourceforge.net/docs/programmers-guide/reference-core.html
What are
