Please let me clarify: I think it was the original collective decision
that was ill-informed, and not the decision to vote on the issue, or
to honour the result of that vote.
But it now appears that safety is a concern (as Matt points out),
which wasn't originally understood. Since it's a
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Michael Allan m...@zelea.com wrote:
But it now appears that safety is a concern (as Matt points out),
which wasn't originally understood. Since it's a question of safety
vs. convenience, then maybe it's better to revert immediately to the
default setting (the
I find myself agreeing. While emails that reply to all when the
intentioned recipient is a just a specific friend are tragic, the
default reply to behavior for most emails on this list(or at least
mine) is to the entire list. That's what a mailing list is for?
-Andrew
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:52
The strain on server argument and the list server filtering argument seem silly
to me (I doubt any configuration other than allowing very large attachments
will substantially impact the server and Mailman does redundancy filtering
quite well if you allow it)... and I'm on lists where forwarding
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Michael Allan m...@zelea.com wrote:
Maxim Kammerer said:
... Any decent mailing list uses reply-to-list as a default. ...
Pardon me, but that's not true. GNU Mailman is a decent list server
and it ships with reply-to-sender.
I wrote “mailing list”, not
From: James McKinney ja...@opennorth.ca
I'd like to announce to this group a new community project aimed at people
creating civic technology and (re-)publishing government data to adopt
standards for their data and APIs: the Popolo project.
http://popoloproject.com/
A major barrier to
Remember the Cyberwar discussion we had some weeks ago?
Now the NATO official defines the Cyberwar:
http://ccdcoe.org/249.html
Andreas
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
I'm very impressed by this project:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/19/carna_botnet_ipv4_internet_map/
http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/paper.html
http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/images.html
A hardcore but, as many note, 'necessary' strategy if one wishes to get
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 18:02 +0200, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
Isn't that a valid point?
No, it's a useless imaginary construct. A valid point would be an
example (preferably, more than one) of such an email on this list,
where it would be possible to debate whether the person actually
deserved
Maybe I have a hard time understanding since I don't use email to discuss
anything that would be embarrassing, career ending, and most certainly not life
threatening. However, it would seem that even if someone /does/ talk about
those things using email -- they should be doing it with
If we're going to require people to use their brains, perhaps its
not too much to ask that individuals take responsibility for paying
attention to who they are speaking to.
This is not a personally configurable setting on the mailing list
software, and we're
Strange how so many are citing security norms for (say) encryption but not
the one that systems should always fail to the safest setting. (Which isn't
always the most functional.)
I actually prefer it the way it is. Yet I certainly appreciate the
alternative concern and would support the change
From: Derrick L. Cogburn dcogb...@american.edu
It is my pleasure to write to you on behalf of the APSA ITP Section
committee to select the Outstanding Software Development and Learning
Innovation Awards for 2013. These are two separate awards, and the
committee and I encourage you to submit
Hi Lorelei,
You might be surprised to hear this, I certainly was. Apparently
Representative Darrell Issa has been pushing a bunch of opensource
development around WordPress and potentially other OpenGov applications.
Brian
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Lorelei Kelly
Darrell Issa, Ron Wyden
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
On Mar 20, 2013 2:14 PM, Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv wrote:
Hi Lorelei,
You might be surprised to hear this, I certainly was. Apparently
Representative
I believe Zoe Loffgrin (sp) has been pretty good on these sorts of
issues lately as well.
Wayne
On 3/20/2013 12:23, xek3149 wrote:
Darrell Issa, Ron Wyden
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org http://www.asciiribbon.org - against
proprietary attachments
On
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:49:50 -0700
Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv wrote:
C. Unless we are having a larger discussion about the
risks/fallibility of trademark copyright and authorship in a global
society, what are we talking about here?
Tor's model is we give out code away for free, our
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Lorelei Kelly loreleike...@gmail.comwrote:
Its not a lobbying effort, but a long term policy education effort.
Lobbying: most generally, the right of the individual to petition Congress
to redress grievances.
In your case, larnin' them what they don't know
Can we just vote already? This is getting out of hand and a perfect example why
this list is increasingly useless with too many flame wars and not enough
substantive content...
On Mar 20, 2013, at 13:52, Gregory Foster gfos...@entersection.org wrote:
If we're going to require people to use
Please vote by submitting your preference to me by 11.59 pm PST on
Sunday, March 24, 2013. Any votes received after this date and time
will not be counted.
reply-to-poster please
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/
Yosem Companys said:
Dear Liberationtech list
One is tempted to suggest using other than Skype. Alternatives exist, and these
are secure, at least according to their claims. As well, Skype's code is not
transparent, in the way that other, open source, applications' are.
louis
On 13-03-20, at 22:39 , Eric S Johnson
21 matches
Mail list logo
