So, I've been wondering...
If the CFAA makes it a felony to violate a website's terms of service,
wouldn't the logical way to protest this absurd interpretation of the law
to write Terms of Service that forbid members of the US government--
especially Congress and the Department of Justice-- from
Individuals can't file criminal charges and it is up to law enforcement
and prosecutor's discretion as to whether they do. They won't so you're
out of luck there. You could file civil lawsuits as the CFAA has a right
of civil action. However, you'd need to fund it with the high likelihood
that
Do you have a link?
On 9/22/13 11:51 AM, Griffin Boyce wrote:
There are some really great unenforceable TOSs out there. The best
I've seen is a clause which states that it is a violation of the Terms
of Service to read the Terms of Service. (But of course, how would you
know unless you
On 09/17/2013 04:46 PM, Michael Rogers wrote:
[...]
Please push me back on the right track if I have a blind spot
here-- I'm having a difficult time seeing a technical difference
between a social network that allows partial views of the graph in
order to maintain a semblance of privacy, and a
People would be generally safe, since my experience is that only dweebs
such as ourselves ever read them. ;) Everyone else ticks off the box and
moves on.
I have been tempted to write TOS that contract to promise rights to
primageniture bondage and see what happens...
yrs,
On Sun, Sep 22,
On 9/22/2013 10:32 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
So, if we assume the worst, and figure we're just doing damage-control and
minimizing a large problem, what are the best-practices to follow in
configuring Cisco routers in remote locations?
Generate max-length (4096-bit?) RSA keys on them, for
