Re: [liberationtech] Silent Phone source code available on GitHub

2013-10-05 Thread Karl Fogel
Joseph Lorenzo Hall writes: >Definitely what I call "disclosed source". I doubt they'd license with >an open source license, let alone accept external commits. As long as >the license allows review, static analysis, debugging compilation, etc. >-- i.e., things needed for technical evaluation --

[liberationtech] FW: Urgent notice from PureVPN

2013-10-05 Thread Eric S Johnson
Hmmm (below). OpenPGP: 0x1AF7E6F2 ● Skype: oneota ● XMPP/OTR: bere...@jabber.ccc.de ● Silent Circle: +1 312 614-0159 From: Uzair Gadit [mailto:uzair.ga...@purevpn.com] Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 11.28 To: [xxx] Subject: Urgent notice f

Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor

2013-10-05 Thread John Adams
Ah, point taken. Referrer leak would be very interesting to research here. -j On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 04:36:27PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote: > > On 05/10/13 16:31, John Adams wrote: > > > On Oct 5, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > >

[liberationtech] the virtual revolution in Second Life -- virtual model or just more RL?

2013-10-05 Thread Shava Nerad
A virtual trip report with the strongest insider activist biases. Probably if anyone wants a paper out of this, I'm a subject, not an author. Perhaps a small thing in the larger world, where Tor has been in the headlines for Silk Road and amusing powerpoint presentations by the NSA this week, eh?

Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor

2013-10-05 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 04:36:27PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 05/10/13 16:31, John Adams wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > >> I wonder if tor.eff.org has any referer logs from 2006 showing inbound > >> traffic from http://wiki.gchq/ or similar. > > > > .gchq isn't a

Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor

2013-10-05 Thread Ximin Luo
On 05/10/13 16:31, John Adams wrote: > > > On Oct 5, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > >> I wonder if tor.eff.org has any referer logs from 2006 showing inbound >> traffic from http://wiki.gchq/ or similar. > > .gchq isn't an Internet TLD, so > That's doubtful. > > -j > Intranet DNS

Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor

2013-10-05 Thread John Adams
On Oct 5, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote: > I wonder if tor.eff.org has any referer logs from 2006 showing inbound > traffic from http://wiki.gchq/ or similar. .gchq isn't an Internet TLD, so That's doubtful. -j -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violati

Re: [liberationtech] Silent Phone source code available on GitHub

2013-10-05 Thread Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Definitely what I call "disclosed source". I doubt they'd license with an open source license, let alone accept external commits. As long as the license allows review, static analysis, debugging compilation, etc. -- i.e., things needed for technical evaluation -- that's a good thing. Right? be

Re: [liberationtech] 49 Page NSA analysis of Tor

2013-10-05 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:05:23PM -0700, d.nix wrote: > Just published by Bart Gellman (Thanks Bart!): > > http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/world/nsa-research-report-on-the-tor-encryption-program/501/ This is the output of a student Summer Program project, as advertised here: http://www.nsa