http://liberationtechnology.stanford.edu/events/7964
Reporting from Cuba: How Pixels are Bringing Down the Wall of Censorship
CDDRL Special Seminar
DATE AND TIME
October 28, 2013
4:30 PM - 6:00 PM
AVAILABILITY
Open to the public
RSVP required by 5PM October 25
SPEAKER
Yoani Sanchez -
All really well put, Shava, and I couldn't agree more. I actually met with
Jessica this morning after requesting they change the title (almost missed
my flight as a result!), and she spoke with her editor about it. They'd
apparently have to do it through issuing a correction, which sounds a
little
Shava Nerad:
But if you look at the press or boosters or detractors, there is
misinformation, disinfo, and just a lot of glitter and FUD out there.
Not to jump on TechPresident, but to use them as an example (but because it
was posted here...), there's a tendency to pit groups against one
Hey Shava! Thanks for your feedback.
We wanted the headline to suggest that Lantern was the next new, exciting
thing in anti-censorship, and the easiest way to signal that was by
mentioning Tor. For what it is--scalable blocking resistance--it could very
well be better than Tor. We did not mean
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Adam Fisk af...@getlantern.org wrote:
... we really would love to hear any criticisms of Lantern people may
have, including anything technical or ...
make Latern function as a pluggable transport for Tor!
Totally agreed. We've been considering integrating Tor nodes in some way
with Lantern for awhile, originally inspired by conversations with
@ioerror. I think something along those lines could be incredibly
effective, and I just added it in the more general idea section of our
somewhat sparse
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:44:46PM -0700, Adam Fisk wrote:
We do, however, strongly believe in the potential of WebRTC to provide both
interesting cover traffic as well as usability improvements that come as a
result of reusing technology already built into the browser.
I agree! I think the
