Oh c'mon! That argumentation is completely flawed... Who in the earth might
believe that because of the user blocking your communication your will be
liable for some kind of irresponsible disaster information broadcast?
This is bullshit! Does that mean that all the news should be subtitled
His statement:
The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and
the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has
been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any
traditional battlefield, and due to this
Maybe because of the difficulty on finding those vulnerabilities to exploit the
system.
Being bulletproof against everything, as we know, is impossible, therefore if
you notice that the government (with a huge amount of resources) have found a
vulnerability in your software you can accept
BTW (same comment in two pages :P):
The vulnerability being exploited by this attack was fixed in Firefox 22 and
Firefox ESR 17.0.7. The vulnerability used is MFSA 2013-53People who are on the
latest supported versions of Firefox are not at risk.Although the vulnerability
affects users of
guesses, then it seems that the one biassed by
his ideology is you.
Mitar
[1]
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~tygar/papers/Why_Johnny_Cant_Encrypt/OReilly.pdf
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Albert López newbieswo...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Moreover when they say our backend infrastructure
@lists.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Heml.is - The Beautiful Secure Messenger
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Albert López
new...@overflowedminds.net wrote:
And who says so? If nobody is able to assure that, why should I use the app?
I mean that I wouldn't base the security
This may be true, but what is undeniable is that this guy is a bit braggart...
I mean, yes, they may have tons of 0days, but in which software? In my aunt's
software perhaps... But if government is paying 100k for an iOS 0day [cite
needed] what are you telling me... ?
I suppose it's a partial
Hello Wasabee,
I've used TextSecure but I found that it's like sending encrypted SMS,
therefore you have the consequent cost associated to it. I don't know if
Heml.is will be a kind of secure whatsapp or if it will have the same approach
of TextSecure.
Correct me if I'm wrong with the SMS
Hello Nadim,
Don't be ashamed. Shit happens. I hope you don't get frustrated by all this.
Keep working. It's easy to criticize the work of others, but whats hard is
believing in and developing a great project such as cryptocat.
This kind of work is really important. Of course, we have to be
