Andrew: That is exactly what I was trying to say but you explained it much
better :-)
Erik
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 8, 2012, at 6:37 AM, liberationt...@lewman.us wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 05:18:02PM -0700, e...@sundelof.com wrote 4.7K bytes
in 111 lines about:
:partial defenses
nonetheless agree wholeheartedly.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Erik Sundelof e...@sundelof.com wrote:
I am astonished yet not about how many people believe there is an absolute
solution for security. I personally think it is dishonest to users in real
need of protecting their security. Any
I think it is a good step forward the very least. As long as the visual blur
tool call cannot be hijacked/tracked either via HTTP request or client side
calls it seems as a tool which would be very useful for plenty.
In general I am always hesitant of assigning secure or safe to any
