Re: [liberationtech] Detekt

2014-11-22 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:02:24PM -0500, AntiTree wrote: I don't see what this would do that an AV wouldn't. Of the samples I've reviewed, most (all?) have been detected by AV. On the contrary, Claudio has documented several RATs and other surveillance malwares used by repressive governments

Re: [liberationtech] Detekt

2014-11-22 Thread John Adams
I'm on vacation at the moment and it's going to take some time to analyze Detekt, but there are a number of problems with the software so far that need help and possibly a write-up or two. Most of it makes me think, something doesn't smell right here. Here are some random thoughts after a first

[liberationtech] Detekt

2014-11-20 Thread Richard Brooks
Any reviews/opinions of this: https://resistsurveillance.org/ -- Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password

Re: [liberationtech] Detekt

2014-11-20 Thread AntiTree
I don't see what this would do that an AV wouldn't. Of the samples I've reviewed, most (all?) have been detected by AV. On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Richard Brooks r...@g.clemson.edu wrote: Any reviews/opinions of this: https://resistsurveillance.org/ -- Liberationtech is public