On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 06:41:12PM +0200, Ernad Halilovic wrote:
First of all, thank you for all your valuable input on this list.
You're very kind, but my contributions are minor and unimportant. Others
have done far more.
I wanted to ask you if you have any good resources on getting the
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 06:34:42PM +0200, Eleanor Saitta wrote:
The issue with this approach is that maintaining infrastructure like
this takes an ongoing time commitment by someone who is clueful (and
thus at least moderately expensive for broke organizations where
everyone's constantly
Rich and Ernad,
If you could reply to the list about what you come up with I and probably
others would be grateful.
Unfortunately many who need these tools will not even be aware where to
begin looking for hardware.
Let us know when you finish the book, and I hope it is short and to the
point.
+1 Eleanor.
On Jun 14, 2013 6:38 PM, Eleanor Saitta e...@dymaxion.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.06.14 18.20, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
Now since I have (once again) opened my big mouth, I'll step up as
well: if any organizations want to get their email out
Until you become a nuisance, at which point the state just requests
cancelation/blocking/surveillance of your single static IP address?
I'm asking, because I'm not clueful on this issue and interested to hear
more as you and rich are touting this as all being very easy, which seems
unlikely...
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 06:05:47AM -0700, Brian Conley wrote:
Until you become a nuisance, at which point the state just requests
cancelation/blocking/surveillance of your single static IP address?
There are alternative ways to circumvent that (e.g. look at
Retroshare, which does not need
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:11:34AM -0700, William Gillis wrote:
Now that everyone knows about the NSA isn't it time you tackled setting up
PGP?
If it's not transparent, Johny User will eventually drop it.
Before you do that, rather enable StartTLS on your mail
transport agent (e.g. postfix).
Eugen, I don't think MTA configuration will help the target audience
of the cryptoparties. I doubt many of them run their own mail servers.
I believe they are targeting end user client machines.
Of course you are right that many users will stop using it if it is
difficult. The idea of the
Any little bit helps. +1 to cryptoparties.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Matt Johnson railm...@gmail.com wrote:
Eugen, I don't think MTA configuration will help the target audience
of the cryptoparties. I doubt many of them run their own mail servers.
I believe they are targeting end user
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 08:04:24AM -0700, Matt Johnson wrote:
Eugen, I don't think MTA configuration will help the target audience
of the cryptoparties. I doubt many of them run their own mail servers.
Relying on your ISP-issued relay or your mail provider's
SMTP provides a convenient one-stop
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
ICBM: 48.07100
Hey, Eugene, do you have your very own ICBM - Inter-Continental
Ballistic Missile? if so, is it aimed at you, or are you aiming it
at someone/thing/where else?
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés
This thread has deteriorated, so we are moderating it. As a reminder,
personal attacks are not tolerated on this list.
Yosem, one of your moderators.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
alps6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Eugen Leitl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.06.14 18.20, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
Now since I have (once again) opened my big mouth, I'll step up as
well: if any organizations want to get their email out of the
cloud/third parties, contact me off-list. I have a pretty good
stash of
13 matches
Mail list logo
