Definitely what I call disclosed source. I doubt they'd license with
an open source license, let alone accept external commits. As long as
the license allows review, static analysis, debugging compilation, etc.
-- i.e., things needed for technical evaluation -- that's a good thing.
Right?
Joseph Lorenzo Hall j...@cdt.org writes:
Definitely what I call disclosed source. I doubt they'd license with
an open source license, let alone accept external commits. As long as
the license allows review, static analysis, debugging compilation, etc.
-- i.e., things needed for technical
Petter Ericson pett...@acc.umu.se writes:
So, Silent Circle (well, Silent Phone) is finally open source!
Thank you, Petter -- it sounds like this release was a lot of hard work.
But it doesn't appear to be actually open source. At least, I couldn't
find a license file containing an open source
So, Silent Circle (well, Silent Phone) is finally open source!
At least, the previous version, with the next one coming in a couple of weeks.
This, to me, is absolutely wonderful news, as it is finally possible to get a
proper security audit of the whole shebang.
Github issue:
