In the end, it remains amusing that people are worried about the impact caused
by the possibilities of potential spying by diplomatic and security agencies.
If you really want to be on the cutting edge relative to the US Government, you
need to instead start thinking about how its taxation
Of course, I totally agree with you on the importance of transparency.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:27 AM Nathan Andrew Fain
wrote:
> Clarifications beyond cyber-defense would be necessary. Job posts for
> government agencies require at least as much transparency as we would be
> provided in a job
Clarifications beyond cyber-defense would be necessary. Job posts for
government agencies require at least as much transparency as we would be
provided in a job post for a human rights organization.
It is the assumption that there are "good guys" that builds apathy. This
apathy creates such cases
That's an excellent question. The job is a cyber-defense job, not a
cyber-offense one. It also doesn't seem to require a security clearance. So
the job seems to fit the definition of technology for social good in that
it's theoretically speaking advancing global diplomacy.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at
As an international reader of this list I find this job advertisement
could use clarification. There are plenty of jobs in the US State
Department that could be adversarial to liberation tech. One does not
know if this position falls on the evil-side or not-evil-side of the US
State Department.
The *U.S. Department of State* is currently accepting applications for
a Technical
Security Specialist
