On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:35:36PM -0400, The Doctor wrote:
There is a problem with that: Traffic to and from small providers has
to traverse the networks of the tier-II and tier-I providers to go any
appreciable distance. We already know that at least some of the
peering points are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2013 03:24 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
It occurs to me that Prism exclusively targets large providers.
This suggests that it relies on economies of scale. Which suggests
a defense against Prism: use small providers, because there are
It occurs to me that Prism exclusively targets large providers. This
suggests that it relies on economies of scale. Which suggests a defense
against Prism: use small providers, because there are diseconomies of scale.
Thoughts?
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
Legal Struggles Over Interception Rules in the United States - EFF
https://www.eff.org/pages/legal-struggles-over-interception-rules-united-states
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs to me that Prism exclusively targets large providers. This
