I am sure that was a very hard move by EFF after being part of this
group for five years.
Corporate members being meddled with in regard to their security
practices about their internal privacy and security systems is no way
to effectively run any civil society that is hopeful of keeping people
I believe it was The right thing to do, just like eating Quaker Oats.
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco Sanfuentes
a...@acm.org
+1 (817) 271-9619
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:43 AM, LilBambi lilba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure that was a very hard move by EFF after
TL;DR - Gpg4win is unusable for the average internet user
==
Okay, I had a hard drive die on me a couple of weeks ago and I just
reinstalled Windows and all the drivers on it last night. This morning when
I was installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/13 01:14, carlo von lynX wrote:
No one anywhere has solved the problem of asynchronous,
forward-secret group cryptography.
I think you have to be a bit opportunistic about it. Briar does it
somehow, if I understood correctly.
Yes and
Gregory Maxwell:
My other big technical complaint about PGP is (3) in the post, that
every encrypted message discloses what key you're communicating with.
PGP easily _undoes_ the privacy that an anonymity network like tor can
provide. It's possible to use --hidden-recipient but almost no one
Great piece here by Josh Stearns of Free Press and Freedom of the Press
Foundation for the Committee to Protect Journalists' Journalist Security
Blog.
http://cpj.org/security/2013/10/solidarity-in-the-face-of-surveillance.php
Solidarity in the face of surveillance
By Josh Stearns/CPJ guest
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tempest temp...@tushmail.com wrote:
Gregory Maxwell:
My other big technical complaint about PGP is (3) in the post, that
every encrypted message discloses what key you're communicating with.
PGP easily _undoes_ the privacy that an anonymity network like tor
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM, carlo von lynX
l...@time.to.get.psyced.org wrote:
We had some debate on this topic at the Circumvention Tech
Summit and I got some requests to publish my six reasons
not to use PGP. Well, I spent a bit more time on it and now
they turned into 10 reasons not to.
Gregory Maxwell:
Do you think any of your users should want to send you email to
anonymous one time use tech support mailboxes using that key, provably
showing they were communicating to you to anyone who can monitor their
email? Do you think your users will even realize that sending you
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Tempest temp...@tushmail.com wrote:
a fair point. but one could significantly address this issue by hosting
the public key on a tor hidden service. that would greater ensure that,
in order to get your key, they would be using a system that protects
against
yeah, but we have to go further, and get the United Nations HQ The
Heck out of the USA
http://gadebate.un.org/68/venezuela-bolivarian-republic
por eso y por mucho más!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G--xIaMTSuc
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco Sanfuentes
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
alps6...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, but we have to go further, and get the United Nations HQ The
Heck out of the USA
If you want an impotent organization to be even moreso - then that's a
good move. The problem is while all this
Yes, of course. BUT!
Look at HISTORY
Why did the US become the seat of the UN?
And now, for THOSE SAME REASONS
The US should NOT be the SEAT of the UN
Best Regards | Cordiales Saludos | Grato,
Andrés L. Pacheco Sanfuentes
a...@acm.org
+1 (817) 271-9619
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:16 PM,
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Andrés Leopoldo Pacheco Sanfuentes
alps6...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, of course. BUT!
*snip*
Then the rest is moot - that's my point. Unless you can substantially
change the behavior of the permanents seats of the UN Security Council
- ~where~ the figureheads meet
14 matches
Mail list logo
