- Forwarded message from Randy Bush ra...@psg.com -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:46:25 +0900
To: North American Network Operators' Group na...@nanog.org
Subject: alexandria cable cutters?
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0
Hi liberationtech,
my name is Simon. I am a German software engineer. I propose to develop
a (web) app providing end-to-end encryption for email; covering the
following features:
- no installation
- for all devices
- fast and secure hosted by Amazon-Web-Service
All source code will be
I don't think it's a huge leap to suggest that someone may be trying
to hobble telecommunications in/out of the Middle East, that they're
doing so for a reason, and that they'll try again.
---rsk
- Forwarded message from Randy Bush ra...@psg.com -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Date:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Simon Rothe wrote:
- fast and secure hosted by Amazon-Web-Service
I wouldn't.
(a) Nobody with any clue accepts SMTP traffic from Amazon's cloud,
as it's proven itself to be a massive source of spam and other forms of
SMTP-borne abuse. Attempts to get
A quick question: I don't suppose anyone knows where I can find a good English
translation of the Mexican Geo-location/Geo-localization law, do they?
Many thanks
Paul
Dr Paul Bernal
Lecturer
UEA Law School
University of East Anglia
Norwich Research Park
Norwich NR4 7TJ
email:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/26/2013 04:03 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
I find the observations in the article extremely grim and
depressing - it is largely as a matter of agreement, I might add.
*** +1
Consider this as a threat not only to the Dutch democratic
On 28/03/13 14:41, hellekin wrote:
On 03/26/2013 04:03 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
I find the observations in the article extremely grim and
depressing - it is largely as a matter of agreement, I might add.
*** +1
Agreed, but
Consider this as a threat not only to the Dutch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013.03.28 00.45, Carol Waters wrote:
At the risk of igniting an inbox-exploding smackdown thread, I
think the following piece by Schneier
http://www.darkreading.com/blog/240151108/on-security-awareness-training.html
is definitely worth a
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:45:45PM -0400, Carol Waters wrote:
At the risk of igniting an inbox-exploding smackdown thread [...]
You say that like it's a bad thing. ;-)
I'll quote Marcus Ranum on the subject of educating users, from his essay:
The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security
Dear Liberation Tech Colleagues,
Check out this important new report:
http://www.nten.org/sites/default/files/ntap_sra_public_report_-_final_0.pdf
It's a result of a collaboration among the following great organizations:
- 501cTech
- Idealware
- Network For Good
- NPower
- NTEN (Nonprofit
Andrés said:
The beauty of democracy! :-)
Well, the decision is binding and must be respected. But the issue
decided here is not the issue that was raised by Joseph Lorenzo Hall
and defined by Matt Mackall. We can see this from the comments that
accompany the public votes. One or two voters
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Simon Rothe wrote:
- fast and secure hosted by Amazon-Web-Service
I wouldn't.
snip
(b) The assertion that Amazon's cloud is secure has no proof. Nor will
it have proof anytime soon
PS - A fellow list administrator kindly points out that I'm wrong
about the actual configuration variables. And in that connection, I
also misrepresented what Karl was saying. (Sorry for the added noise
and confusion.) The actual config variables are:
(1) Should any existing Reply-To: header
We voted on #2 because that was the issue Joseph Lorenzo Hall raised (see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.html).
He specifically asked for the following:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not reply-all by default
been
broached? Maybe I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/2013 10:51 AM, Lex van Roon wrote:
Without any factual evidence this is just speculation imho. Do you
have some publicly accessible sources that can confirm these
facts?
*** Please define this and these. I suppose you're referring to
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim Murray jim.mur...@stanford.edu
Date: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM
*Food Hackathon 9AM April 6, 2013 - 7PM April 7, 2013 (Saturday and Sunday)
http://foodhackathon.eventbrite.com/#
*
We thought you might be interested in the event highlighted
Yosem Companys compa...@stanford.edu writes:
We voted on #2 because that was the issue Joseph Lorenzo Hall raised
(see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu/msg03767.
html). He specifically asked for the following:
Has the possibility of reconfiguring libtech to not
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net writes:
Karl,
in this message from you there was one Reply-To header, set to:
Karl Fogel kfo...@red-bean.com,
liberationtech liberationtech@lists.stanford.edu
Thank you. Then we're at least avoiding the can't find my way back
home problem, which is
Hi all,
I'm not comfortable enough with this list to reply-all very often (while it's a
very informative list, the tenor doesn't match my own style, especially for a
list with public archives), and it is a non-standard configuration -- in my
experience -- to reply-to-list.
That being said,
19 matches
Mail list logo
