Deniability is not inherently better. Of course it has advantages. But a world
that only had deniable cryptography would be worse than one which also had
systems like TrueCrypt whose presence is not hidden.
It makes no sense to argue that an improved version of TrueCrypt is no better
if it’s
If anybody comes up with a such a map for the bay area, I'd love to see it.
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe,
change to digest, or
Let's say web servers auto generated self-signed certificates for any
domain that didn't supply its own certificate, likely one from an authority.
What that would accomplish is to make the stream unreadable over the wire,
unless the attacker was willing and able to do an MITM with their own auto
, at 16:35, Guido Witmond gu...@witmond.nl wrote:
On 03/14/14 19:56, Julian Oliver wrote:
..on Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:46:30AM -0700, Lucas Gonze wrote:
Let's say web servers auto generated self-signed certificates for any
domain that didn't supply its own certificate, likely one from
The shoes left to drop:
1) NSA insiders using privileged information for investments. It's hard to
imagine this doesn't happen.
2) How precisely do businesses get the NSA and CIA to create competitive
advantages? How do they convince the Trade Representative that they deserve
government
Again, the cash payments are a deception. They are in no way enough to
compensate these companies. Operational expenses associated with processing
data requests are a small part of the overall cost.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall j...@cdt.org wrote:
On 9/10/13 4:51 PM,
Let's say major corps like ATT and Chase are doing favors for NSA. Why
would they if not for a quid pro quo?
And if they are getting favors in return, isn't that illegal?
I wonder if there is evidence to show what the payback is.
--
Liberationtech is a public list whose archives are searchable
not legal to pay for preferential treatment from the government,
that's bribery. Why would it be illegal for the NSA to pay ATT Chase?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's say major corps like ATT and Chase are doing favors for NSA. Why
would
?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let's say major corps like ATT and Chase are doing favors for NSA. Why
would they if not for a quid pro quo?
And if they are getting favors in return, isn't that illegal?
I wonder if there is evidence to show what
. It is not a workflow for online service providers.
-Lucas Gonze
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
the world at large through our various activities, online and
off. And it is also why we are supportive of the efforts of people like
Evgeny Morozov and others in journalism who seek to improve public
discourse.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.com wrote:
I find
Bob, can you give examples alternatives to pipes owned by service providers?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Bob Frankston
bob19-0...@bobf.frankston.com wrote:
I realize it's very hard to give up on the idea of networks but they are no
more necessary for communicating than railroads are for
It occurs to me that Prism exclusively targets large providers. This
suggests that it relies on economies of scale. Which suggests a defense
against Prism: use small providers, because there are diseconomies of scale.
Thoughts?
--
Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password
the ideal would be to hit a high enough rate that it makes real-time
analysis of content (by a human) impossible. By the time the service hit
that rate of chats, it will be nigh-unusable by people.
Every client could broadcast a message on a timer. Sometimes the message
would be wheat and
14 matches
Mail list logo
