Griffin Boyce grif...@cryptolab.net writes:
My feedback is that Tinfoil SMS will not gain much traction as its
name marginalizes its users. Wanting more security is not sketchy.
Wanting privacy is not a tinfoil hat situation. Cheekiness can be
good, but this is a space where you start out at
On 10/01/2013 04:44 AM, Travis Biehn wrote:
I see no reason to chill competition with whisper systems offerings.
The stego option is appealing, I'm assuming you'll be trying it with MMS?
The field is large enough that several competitors could have healthy
userbases at the same time. I
https://github.com/tinfoilhat/tinfoil-sms
Thej
--
Thejesh GN | ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
--
Liberationtech is public archives are searchable on Google. Violations of
list guidelines will get you moderated:
On 09/30/2013 08:05 AM, Thejesh GN wrote:
https://github.com/tinfoilhat/tinfoil-sms
Why not make it interoperate with TextSecure? That would be fantastic.
https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/
Here's how:
https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/wiki/Protocol
--
Liberationtech
Google Play informs me that this APP is not avaliable in my region. Hmm
30.09.2013 18:05, Thejesh GN пишет:
https://github.com/tinfoilhat/tinfoil-sms
Thej
--
Thejesh GN | ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID : 0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
--
Liberationtech is public archives are
I'm curious why you think someone should use this over textsecure? What
advantages are you providing?
Have you written any encryption software before this? Encryption is
notoriously hard to get right and easy to get wrong. I noticed that you
have plans to do a security audit on this. I would
On Sep 30, 2013 6:02 PM, Cooper Quintin coo...@radicaldesigns.org wrote:
I'm curious why you think someone should use this over textsecure? What
advantages are you providing?
Have you written any encryption software before this? Encryption is
notoriously hard to get right and easy to get
